ethanplant
That being said, I’m confused by why what is essentially a beginner learning project is being wrapped in language that makes it sound like a Series B startup.
When Rust Gets Ugly
Setting up Webmentions on my Static Site
Show HN: Elsewhere – a local POSSE CLI for static-site writers
Good writing is almost never neutral. It can be fair, careful, honest, and proportionate. But if it has nothing to say, it isn’t good writing.
B.C. 'preparing legal action' against OpenAI
Where I disagree is the framing that it’s a binary between “age verification for all” or “legal liability for parents”. There is a third option: change the incentives for the organizations designing and operating the systems children are using.
Regulate recommender systems, addictive defaults, reporting and appeal mechanisms, non-consensual intimate imagery response, synthetic sexual abuse material, dark patterns, safety plans, transparency, audits, and penalties for platforms that fail to respond properly. Those are all aimed at the organizations creating or amplifying the harm. This is, admittedly, the most difficult approach, but it’s also the approach that actually addresses the root cause.
My concern is that an under-16 account ban turns the enforcement problem into an age-assurance problem for all users. The platform has to determine who is under 16 somehow, which means assessing everyone’s age. That creates privacy and access-control infrastructure while the most vulnerable teenagers are also the ones most likely to route around it.
So yes, change incentives. I just think the incentives should be aimed directly at platform conduct and design, not at making everyone prove they are old enough to participate online.
Bill C-34 Answers Child Safety with Identity Infrastructure
The op log was peer-to-peer the whole time
My Nintendo DS Broadcasts Radio (Kinda)
This is my philosophy too working in infrastructure. It’s my job to care way too much so downstream users don’t have to.
Bridger Is Building an Osint Dossier in a Cute Font
Make Something Wonderful
Canada Keeps Sabotaging Its Own Digital Sovereignty
The web is changing, and we are not going back
Self-Hosting on the Dark Web
You do raise a pretty good point though, Canada has long benefited from being perceived as a relatively trustworthy jurisdiction. So even if OpenBSD themselves are out of scope, there is a negative reputational hit that will impact Canadian tech.
Bill C-22 Is a Mess of the Government's Own Making
Google warns lawful-access bill could create major cybersecurity risks
That’s a lot easier said than done.
That being said, the fact that the obvious attack vector goes completely unaddressed gives me pause.
This isn’t the answer though. It’s not technically feasible and doesn’t actually address the problem.
Your falling into the classic software brain trap of thinking the solution to a social problem is a technical one, when that isn’t necessarily the case.
I also have a very specific voice. Blunt. Slightly irritated. Highly opinionated. AI is pretty bad at trying to emulate that well.