eor

I went to a Montessori school from pre-K through 6th grade. Overall I think it was a good experience. But the transition to traditional school was very rough. I was mostly fine academically, but socially it was brutal. I had been going to school with the same 10 people for most of my life, and then suddenly found myself in a crowd of hundreds of strangers with no clue how to make new friends. Add to that all the hormonal stuff going on with 12-13 year olds, and it's a bad scene. It took me about 3 years to acclimate. I think 7th grade is a particularly bad time to be making the transition. It might have been easier if I'd made the jump in grade 5 or 6.

Based on what I've seen in their engineering blogs, they've been spending a lot of time on streamlining the production and distribution process. I guess that makes sense for a production company. But I wonder if they're getting good value for what they're spending on it. It may so much less than what they're spending on producing content that nobody's paying attention.

It's not a book, but Christophe Pettus' blog (https://thebuild.com/blog) has a lot of really good information. In particular, his talk "Breaking PostgreSQL at Scale" goes through the problems you run into as you hit different levels of scale (https://thebuild.com/presentations/2019-fosdem-broken.pdf)

Would you ever say that to a male colleague? Would anyone?

There are lots of people working on this problem. The NSF Office of Cyberinfrastructure has funded quite a few projects working on long-term data storage and discoverability. The largest of those are probably DataOne (http://www.dataone.org/) and Data Conservancy (http://dataconservancy.org/). The hard part is convincing scientists to use the tools that are available. The NSF already requires that all new proposals include a data management plan. I imagine it won't be long before they start requiring projects to deposit their data in a public or eventually-public repository.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Murder rates have declined comparable amounts in lots of cities that aren't systematically targeting minority residents for harassment.

Either the author or Andreesen completely misunderstands or misrepresents the concept of network neutrality. Network neutrality doesn't mean users don't pay for the bandwidth they consume. It means they pay the same price for that bandwidth regardless of what it's used for.

I think the major funding agencies are aware of the problem and the potential, and are working on solutions in their own way (for example, the NSF Office of Cyberinfrastructure's DataNet program, http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503141). But major cultural change in the way scientific research is conducted just isn't going to happen overnight.

Does anybody remember Apple Dylan (http://wiki.opendylan.org/wiki/view.dsp?title=Apple%20Dylan)? I never used it myself, but I remember reading a lot about it in the late 1990's because I was using Macintosh Common Lisp at the time. In the Apple Dylan IDE, every function, class, and module was an object in an object database; there were no files at all. The IDE was at least 10 years ahead of its time, and as a result the performance was terrible. But it's surprising that nobody has revived the idea of a source database.

Sorry, the link goes to our horrible, PeopleWare-powered recruiting site that you have to access over port 8291. If you're behind any kind of firewall, it probably won't work.

Washington, DC (no remote at this time)

National Geographic Education is looking to hire two engineers to help us build a platform for geospatial Citizen Science: http://goo.gl/1aRLZ

I thought the changes to section 3.3.1 are in the license for the iPhone OS 4.0 SDK, which is still in developer preview. If that's the case, we shouldn't start seeing rejections under 3.3.1 until most developers have upgraded to 4.0.