emilengler
I think that this heavily depends upon the part that is tested or not tested. For certain parts in the kernel, such as the firewall, I truly believe, that such tests cases (including corner ones) shall be present.
Because this does not prevent having the code to land on GitHub at the of the day assuming it is published under a free license.
Now it depends on how you interpret the "MUST". My logic only makes sense if you consider it to a dogmatic-like prevention.
Wrong. Lets say a GPL project is not hosted on GitHub officially. I can easily setup a mirror for it though on GitHub as the GPL doesn't prevent me from doing it...
Point is that anyone can put my work on GitHub, even if I don't want to.Assuming the project is under a free license though.
Atomic Commits in SQLite
“Permissive licensing is wrong?” – No it’s not (2018)
Kcgi: Securing CGI web applications [pdf]
AES in ~500 Lines of C
Epoll-shim: small epoll implementation using kqueue
Even if I am a Firefox user I don't see a sense in using Chrome. The 'features' that Chrome can but Chromium cannot are these that we everyone love:
* DRM * Centralized extension managment
Distroverify 1.0 released, the ultimate tool to verify ISO's
Sysget 2.0 released: The package manager to rule them all
The reason is that I only want features that are supported by the most package managers. Sometimes you get a message that the package manager does not support this (especially chromebrew). I don't want to add features that only works with 2 or 3 package managers. I only want features that should work with every package manager. At the moment there are only essential tools. However I will try to add as many as possible.
Is iOS jailbreaking dead?
I had an iOS jailbreak from 2012-2015 and it was great. When I new turn on my old still jailbroken devices everything looks broken and abandon.