News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

emil_sorensen

OP here! Happy to jump in to answer any questions. :)
OP/founder of kapa (YCS23) here. Happy to answer any questions :)
Re:We Index Images for RAG on Wednesday June 03, 2026 @07:20AM (#48382510)
happy it helped!
Re:We Index Images for RAG on Wednesday June 03, 2026 @04:26AM (#48381377)
it's a cost/latency trade-off in production + very use-case dependent
Re:We Index Images for RAG on Tuesday June 02, 2026 @04:35PM (#48375906)
Thanks! Yep fixed
Re:Is the doc bot docs, or not? on Wednesday July 09, 2025 @08:22AM (#44509159)
Accuracy drops hard with context length still. Especially in more technical domains. Plus latency and cost.
Re:Is the doc bot docs, or not? on Wednesday July 09, 2025 @06:58AM (#44508459)
Docs bots like these are deceptively hard to get right in production. Retrieval is super sensitive to how you chunk/parse documentation and how you end up structuring documentation in the first place (see frontpage post from a few weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44311217).

You want grounded RAG systems like Shopify's here to rely strongly on the underlying documents, but also still sprinkle a bit of the magic of the latent LLM knowledge too. The only way to get that balance right is evals. Lots of them. It gets even harder when you are dealing with GraphQL schema like Shopify has since most models struggle with that syntax moreso than REST APIs.

FYI I'm biased: Founder of kapa.ai here (we build docs AI assistants for +200 companies incl. Sentry, Grafana, Docker, the largest Apache projects etc).

Re:Writing documentation for AI: best practices on Wednesday June 18, 2025 @01:59PM (#44311984)
Thanks for the feedback. We should definitely add that. :)
Re:Writing documentation for AI: best practices on Wednesday June 18, 2025 @12:37PM (#44311346)
OP here. It's kind of ironic that making the docs AI-friendly essentially just ends up being what good documentation is in the first place (explicit context and hierarchy, self-contained sections, precise error messages).
Re: on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @11:11AM (#43185027)
We focus mainly on external use cases (e.g., helping companies like Docker and Monday.com deploy customer facing "Ask AI" assistants) so we don't run into much of that given all data is public.

For internal use cases that require user level permissions that's a freaking rabbit role. I recently heard someone describe Glean as a "permissions company" more so than a search company for that reason. :)

Re: on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:17AM (#43184431)
Super cool! Yep, a lot seems to get lost through distillation.
Re: on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @07:24AM (#43183022)
I suspect you're right here! Excited to get our hands on the non-distilled o3. :)
Re: on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @03:09AM (#43181745)
Yep even with a small bump in performance (which we only saw for a subset of coding questions), it wouldn't be worth the huge latency penalty. Though that will surely go down over time.
Re: on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @01:37AM (#43181290)
Curious if anyone else has run similar experiments?
That's a great point. Reminds me of the "feature, not a bug" Karpathy tweet [0].

[0]: https://x.com/karpathy/status/1733299213503787018?lang=en

I find it so interesting that it's possible to develop a "feeling" of a new model.

Older »