emi2k01

Now, even if we leave our doors open he prefers to stay inside the house with his little brother Vicente, another cat we adopted. We regularly make new toys and play with them.

Vicente has been with us since he was around 1 month old (now 6 months old) so he's way more curious about the outside. We are preparing to start walking them out though I have a feeling we will have to drag Ramón out of the house.

I wouldn't feel bad for confining your cats to your house! They are probably very happy :)

A bit mad because I spent more time playing with it than I would like to admit

> The car wash is 100m away from my house. Should I walk or drive?

I didn't find a way to share the conversation, so here it is the full response in `medium` settings:

---

Walking 100 m is a very short distance—roughly a minute or two at a normal pace. In most situations, walking will be quicker overall because you avoid the time needed to get into the car, start it, and find parking. It also saves fuel and is better for the environment.

*Consider these factors before deciding:*

| Factor | Walking | Driving | |--------|---------|---------| | *Time* | ~1–2 min (plus a few seconds to step out) | ~1 min driving, plus ~1–2 min to get in/out and park | | *Energy/Fuel* | None | Uses a small amount of fuel | | *Weather* | Comfortable if dry & mild | Better if it’s raining, very hot, or icy | | *Physical ability* | Easy for most people | Not needed for such a short trip | | *Car availability* | Not required | Must have a car nearby and be willing to use it | | *Environmental impact* | Zero emissions | Small emissions |

*Recommendation:* If the weather is pleasant and you don’t need the car for anything else right away, walking is the simplest, fastest, and most eco‑friendly choice. Drive only if you’re dealing with inclement weather, have heavy items to carry, or need the car immediately after the wash.

Do you have any specific constraints (e.g., rain, heavy bags, time pressure) that might affect the decision?

This is the equivalent of not being able to use X's API and using a browser to scrape it instead.

It's pretty cool what you can do once you emulate the terminal.

I only made it work with Claude Code but this approach can easily be adapted to Gemini CLI

Let me know your thoughts :)

I see editor support for VSCode, but is it backed by an LSP or is it VSCode only?

I see an `iframe` with this url [1] but the `<body>` of the document is empty. It's very likely you have to change the protocol to `https` (instead of `http`), otherwise the browser refuses to load the url automatically.

[1]: http://player.vimeo.com/video/68089370

You can search for "no_zap" under the `denoland` org if you want to have a bit more context.

I believe it's a form of type checking where, simplifying, things like function bodies are removed and type checking is only done across top-level items.

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1935frs/is_...

People want something easy to use with good defaults. If that wasn't the case, shells wouldn't have a hundreds of plugins dedicated to customizing the prompt.

[1]: https://ui.shadcn.com/docs/components/dropdown-menu#checkbox...

That's not inherent of macros, but how the parser of the macro body is written. Ideally, the jsx code would be transformed to correct Rust code even on broken input, then Rust Analyzer would map the tokens from the expansion to the tokens from the source code to have context for IDE features (rename, autocompletion, go to definition, etc).

I wrote some stuff [1]. It's a bit all over the place since I'm very bad at writing. Here's also a thread with Rust Analyzer's developers [2]

[1]: https://blog.emi0x7d1.dev/improving-autocompletion-in-your-r... [2]: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/16x2kzi/improving_aut...

I can't trigger that redirect on Firefox or Chromium browsers, though. It seems HN puts a `noreferrer` on the link.

If you haven't and you're on Firefox, go to `about:preferences#privacy`, then scroll to the bottom and you should be able to activate it there.