elfinlike
U.S. Pushing Out Spending Cuts Might Have One Advantage
View From the Bottom of the Fiscal Cliff
Re:Statistics on Gun Violence in Alaska Don't Support Gun Control
on Thursday December 20, 2012 @08:53PM (#4951096)
Still a strange reason. Regarding the domain name I tried many others, but they were all taken so you take what you can get. You can always go to www.thetollingbell.com if if makes you happier. The bold is in place in case you don't want to read a bunch of boring stats, but just the highlights.
Re:Statistics on Gun Violence in Alaska Don't Support Gun Control
on Thursday December 20, 2012 @02:42PM (#4949516)
Ah good. Nothing like condemning something you haven't read including the credentials of the author.
Re:Statistics on Gun Violence in Alaska Don't Support Gun Control
on Thursday December 20, 2012 @10:39AM (#4948216)
If you didn't read it, than how do you know what it says?
Statistics on Gun Violence in Alaska Don't Support Gun Control
Re:California Should Be The Economic Model For America
on Monday December 17, 2012 @12:24PM (#4933241)
Regarding "more startups = more failures", not on a percentage basis.
California Should Be The Economic Model For America
Less Gun Control; More Wellness Care
Re:You Can't Keep Your Money Because It Belongs To The Government
on Sunday December 09, 2012 @11:44PM (#4897560)
Here's an article that shows that in several states the total income tax rate will meet or exceed 50% http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2012/12/06/study_50_...
Re:You Can't Keep Your Money Because It Belongs To The Government
on Sunday December 09, 2012 @11:40PM (#4897547)
Not true. Many people in California are already paying 50% or more between state and federal income tax.
Re:You Can't Keep Your Money Because It Belongs To The Government
on Monday December 03, 2012 @11:55AM (#4866342)
Same problem though. Other people deciding how much money an individual gets to keep.
You Can't Keep Your Money Because It Belongs To The Government
The Myth of Austerity
The 3 Factors Leading to the Demise of Hostess
Why Krugman and Stiglitz Are Wrong About Government Spending
Online Learning, Only Better
The Quest For Certainty
Suffering From Financial Repression
3 Things I Hate About Elections
Re:Putting the Brakes on High Frequency Trading
on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @11:22PM (#4610759)
tumult: As a HFT do you guys (in the gender neutral sense) ever worry about rogue algorithms? By that I mean an algorithm that could be used to harm the market or essentially "blind" other algorithms.
Re:Putting the Brakes on High Frequency Trading
on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @11:09PM (#4610724)
I believe this is the entire quote: "The new electronic marketplace has several structural inefficiencies. These are what have permitted HFT to become a destructive force in the market, rather than a passive liquidity providing mechanism. This should not be construed to say that all HFT is bad, but there are 2 important points to make – the structural inefficiencies present in the market have created a massive misallocation of resources into technology that provides no social benefit, and structural deficiencies in market structure have allowed for nefarious or accidental actions to disrupt the market". I agree there are some contextual problems with the citation in the article. Retrieved from http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearin...