News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

egg_head12

Yea it's definitely dismissive of criticism.
Oh no someone is sending nasty messages. If your on the web it's to be expected.
It's mainly only the address you should worried about, but really a domain should have an owner associated with it. Do you complain about public records for who owns a plot of land?
Stalking really? Threats and harassment. Just tell them to gtfo!

I would be more worried about swatting with the address component. I can see that for corporations/businesses.

Re:Reverse-engineering FPGAs [video] on Friday January 19, 2018 @05:50AM (#16185333)
You do realize an open source tool chain was made off this guys work of reverse engineering the ICE series of FPGAs. Also what about real time alteration or reconfiguration of an FPGA? Pretty hard to do without some documentation. Although, that's kinda like self modifying code kinda hard to design something useful with, but not impossible.
Re:Google Memory Loss on Monday January 15, 2018 @06:24PM (#16154391)
Seems reasonable when you put that way, but as you said you are unsure how google handles their indexes. I doubt we will ever will unless your signature is on a NDA.