e2daipi
Page 8 of a presentation by the author[1] shows that out of 7 languages (Japanese, Italian, Spanish, French, German, English, and Mandarin) English is the second most information dense language, Mandarin being the most. Spanish is characterised by a fast rate of low-density syllables.
A Spanish to English comparison (eye-balling) would be that Spanish is spoken at a rate of 7.8 syllables per second vs 6.2 for English (≈ 22.9% faster). (Spanish compared as a lot of comments are referencing its simplicity)
English, compared in the referenced study, achieves the highest information rate, is spoken at a moderate-slow speed with a high information density.
[0] http://www.ddl.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/fulltext/pellegrino/pellegri... [1] http://neukom.dartmouth.edu/docs/pellegrino-presentation-dar...
[1] http://www.ishoppstore.com/en/quad-core/4707-oneplus-one-55-...
[2] http://www.gsmarena.com/oneplus_one_in_stock_at_one_retailer...
[1] http://www.ishoppstore.com/en/quad-core/4697-xiaomi-red-rice...
Ask HN: Buying a domain with someone else's brand in the title
What's the legality of using other peoples' brand names in your url.For instance http://www.googlefight.com/ http://www.google-analytics-book.com/The first is descriptive of the service, and the second appends a product to the brand and application.Does anyone know where/how the line is drawn?gogggle.com? googleappengine.com
It is implied…
This is a HTML5 [web] app.
I believe that you are correct in what you posit, but it is not applicable here.
MoreOrLess: Is salt bad for you? 19 Aug 2011
http://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/more-or-less-behind-the-s...
Starts at about 00:45 up to 16:07.
Giant balloon to be launched to test climate fix hope
Not quite. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrage
I think the way you are looking at it could cost you a bit of money if you are not careful.
Example:
Japanese for mouth 口 = 1 "character" English = 5 charachters
The syllables are irrelevant, though above they match; twitter care about characters.
Also note the:
> "Slightly related"
These, to me, are disparate sentences. Quality time[1] and time are not the same. The second sentence is fine, in it's own right; but the first, comparing the same thing and asserting a difference?
One site comment, "Life changing!". Yup, was for me too…