dundun
I've personally witnessed three blatant thefts in the last few years from my local Duane Reade (that closed down in April). Every time the clerks are like "pretty sure that was the same guy from yesterday". It's never violent or scary. It's just like watching a fight between homeless people in a subway station -- you look, think that's odd, and move on.
> Where in NY are these stores closing? 4 different pharmacies that have closed down since the pandemic just on my path to work, including two a stone's throw from the NY stock exchange. https://maps.app.goo.gl/fJcHCgjVacP5pEuHA https://maps.app.goo.gl/kmDXnjHruMCvS2CA6
I suspect it's not all shrinkage though. I imagine continued trends where we buy more and more things via online retailers like Amazon and the growth of online/by mail pharmacies has contributed too. CVS/Duane Reade are still opening new locations too, so it can't be all that bad.
Maybe that's Meta's play here? Maybe the idea is that the ecosystem around a model could be as valuable or more valuable than the model itself too, so an OSS model could benefit Meta a lot more by gaining more of the ecosystem mind share?
Or Maybe Yann LeCun is just a hippie that dreams of free love and open-source models?
As mentioned in the post, we've pushed Kafka to at least 700,000 events per second. We have room to push it to much more, but stay in tune for post 2 and 3 to see what we're doing instead.
With over 20K jobs/day, Hadoop will be a part of Spotify's data processing stack for quite a while. BigQuery is just a (awesome) piece of the full puzzle.
[spotifier]
Compared to newer frameworks like those described in the FlumeJava and MillWheel papers, MR's growth is flat.
This is also happening in the Hadoop ecosystem too: if you're writing JavaMR by hand, you're probably spending more time and writing less efficient jobs than what you might get by an optimized pig/hive job with tez under the hood. Or through something in the Cascading or Crunch family, which provides useful abstractions on top of MR or other execution engines.
Then there are also a lot of tools popping up that take some if the use cases that were shoehorned into MR which are more natural outside, like ML/iterative computation through Spark.
MR isn't dying inside or outside Google, it's just being abstracted away.
It also comes in handy when your dataset grows dramatically in size.
They aren't in the hotel business, they're marketers and matchmakers.
Many bands allow audience taping but I'm not aware of m?any that allow for commercial distribution of those recordings. If Spotify attempted to distribute those recordings against the bands' policies then it would probably piss off the bands.
That Danny Schmidt is pretty great stuff. You're right about Spotify's lack of content when it comes to stuff like this-- they have all his studio albums but are kind of weak when it comes to live stuff, they have one album. Archive.org definitely fills in this gap (I use it all the time for Dead shows).
The content is generally pretty good but they depend on the artists/labels getting it into aggregators or making it available. Bootlegs won't be there because that would probably piss the bands off.
a) It is a historically cold year for a prolonged period of time
b) You set your heat to 80F all the time
With gas heating, it looks almost impossible to save $250... unless you're heating an NBA arena.
I don't think the Neural Net library was quiet what it was in Lush, but it was getting there.
I'd imagine projects that group similar topics (i.e. these people are all in front of the Great Pyramids or these people are all taking pictures of their babies) which probably will help group/filter content
I suppose you could put a monetary value on the free giveaways or horse trading that gets done though.
< 1910: 4 (0)
1911-1920: 7 (0)
1921-1930: 48 (0)
1931-1940: 123 (4)
1941-1950: 168 (8)
1951-1960: 243 (10)
1961-1970: 297 (5)
1971-1980: 362 (13)
1981-1990: 583 (7)
1991-2000: 1030 (21)
2001-2010: 1937 (27)
2011-Now: 198 (5)As far as Google giving them turn-by-turn capabilities-- that's really the special sauce that sets Android apart. It was probably available, but at a price that Apple didn't want to pay. Plus, Apple probably didn't like that they weren't getting their 30% on the revenue from local search in the Google Maps app.
So, in the long run this will work out for Apple. Sure, the users will be affected in the short term and it may never actually be as good as Google Maps.... but hey look, shiny pictures of 3D buildings
The site appears to be push sponsor products and don't really talk about alternatives. Expect to see lots of endorsements of IBM products.
It wasn't worth 10K to Miso. Potential employees are going to google their name and want nothing to do with them. I sure wouldn't.
Their might be some employers that deny J Wu a job based on an honest post like this, but are they really working for in the first place?
Anyway, great work.
Politicians are getting the message (which to them, may just be that dropping support is a quick and easy way to gain popularity with its younger constituents)
It's the same thing Sprint did a couple years ago when they dumped people that called customer service too much.
I like this clause in the TOS, I'm sure it will make a huge difference:
# If you are an owner, employee, partner, affiliate or representative (legal or otherwise) of any site which enforces compulsory user registration then you are forbidden from accessing any resource of this site. Failure to comply constitutes unauthorized access