dstorrs

- I miss out on the fearmongering

- I save a tremendous amount of time

- If anything important IS happening, everyone will be talking about it, so I'll hear about it

- Even if I do miss hearing about an important issue, what does it matter? What can I actually do to prevent e.g. the fiscal cliff, or the failure of Lehman Brothers, or etc?

- When it comes time to vote, I talk with my friends who actually care about news / politics and, if use their information (plus a bit of research if needed) to decide my vote

- I read Hacker news or other sites like it because the news that geeks want to know about is far more likely to be interesting / relevant.

Aside from some occasional mild embarrassment when someone asks me an opinion on something I'm not aware of -- which can usually be deflected simply by saying something innocuous and then turning the conversation back to them -- this has worked excellently for me.

$7.30 / month for a 0.25G instance (on the members plan)

$11.68 / month for a 0.5G

$22.63 / month for a 1G

I've worked with them a lot, and they are excellent. The underlying hardware is really, really fast, their tech support guys are very competent, and they are highly responsive.

[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs-faq.html#Origin-of-t...

[2] http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/gnuemacs.acro.exp.html

  module Foo
    def hello
      puts "Hello World"
    end
  end

  ...in a different file...

  foo = Foo.new.msg

Seems like bad action at a distance, to me. Or am I missing something? The example about the effects of refining 'each' is also pretty disconcerting.

- City governments have health inspectors that check local restaurants, and food-product companies to ensure they are using good ingredients, that the equipment is clean, etc. In a libertarian world (at least, certain versions of one) this practice would not exist. Now think what happens when a Monsanto executive realizes that paying the occasional legal suit is cheaper than keeping their packing plants clean and disease-free.

There's a second question to ask: how often do you fight?

If you are generally in alignment but disagree sometimes / occasionally, that's good. If you seem to disagree most of the time, that's a problem.

Other specifics I'd look at:

- are you aligned on the fundamentals? (e.g. B2C vs B2B)

- do you fight the same way? If one of you prefers rational discussion and the other prefers combative, whoever-sticks-longest-wins then it's going to go poorly

- how do the fights end? "ok, after thinking about it, I think you were right about XYZ" is very different from "fine, whatever. I'm tired of arguing."

- do you resolve issues and come to agreement or do the same topics come up again and again?

- after a conclusion is reached and a plan is put together, do both parties fulfill their pieces of it reliably and on time?

One very simple way to avoid issues during fights is the 'I statement': "I feel my opinions get ignored a lot..." is a lot less escalation-inducing than "You always ignore my opinions".

Melanie said she tried the standard (accellerator leading presumably to VC) route, it didn't work, she tried another, nonstandard route, it did. Now she is sharing the lesson that alternatives exist.

So, to you, it's not a startup unless it's what the OP calls the "go big or go home" approach. The OP asserts that that is not a critical element of starting up a business, nor a healthy one, nor necessarily one that will increase your odds of success.

Honestly your argument seems odd. If you were able to do a successful company ($2mm / year rev, $3mm exit after 10 years by OP definition) at 19, why didn't you? Why not use that money to fund your "bigger is better" startup instead of taking VC? Or did you?

I like the idea and you've got an interesting internal page, but your front page ("What if deploying your code...") is literally unusable on an iPhone and probably on other mobile platforms -- the button is not visible, nothing is clickable, and it can't be scrolled or resized. You might want to rethink that so as to capture the people who are browsing HN / TechCrunch / whatever while surfing on the bus on the go.

Don't worry about this. Literally every invention since fire falls into this category.

(Edited for content.)

Furthermore, the siciety is completely static -- it's designed that way. It cannot grow or adapt in the face of new opportunities or needs (eg climate shift, resource depletion). Would you want to live like that?

[1] Ok, not strictly true. Other strategies can dominate under certain conditions (finite and pre-known number of iterations, possibility of signal error, etc) but I don't feel that those conditions apply in this case.

"...I decided to migrate the existing system into a single table setup."

"Alternative Proposed Solutions: MySQL Partitioning and Redis"

I'm surprised he didn't consider at Mongo, Couch, etc.

Deploying is it a question of "stop db, replace mysql server binary with percona server binary, start db".

My personal opinion is that unless you have a support contract with MySQL AB, there is very little reason not to use Percona.

But yes, you're right that maps require a join table.