(fourbadcats) Indeed. This sure better be an oversight of something not disabled when transitioning from release candidate to RTM. We will lose credibility with our customers if we claim that our application does not collect any usage data when this is going out over the wire. I noticed that notelemetry.obj is not present with VS 2015 Update 1 so this may have been introduced with Update 2. Let's hope it's gone in Update 3.
and this too:
(spongo2) Let me gather some details
However, this is definitely highly disconcerting.
GCHQ 'attacked Anonymous' hackers
Night work 'throws body into chaos'
Florida man shot dead in cinema texting row
[video] Can a paper helmet protect cyclists' heads?
What happens if authorities seize your laptop?
Underwater hotel rooms: Is down becoming the new up?
The car mechanic who uncorked a childbirth revolution
The engineer who fixed his own heart
First ever comet material found on Earth
The little-told story of the massive WWII pet cull
US adults are dumber than the average human
A Point of View: The man who dreamed of the atom bomb
Pakistan To Ban Skype, Viber For 3 Months Over Terrorist Usage
I agree that the continued use of the abbreviation in the article itself is bad journalism.
If they used something like Perfect Forward Secrecy, could they not legitimately have claimed to be unable to defeat their own system (as it is currently configured)?
World’s first digital laser unveiled in South Africa [video]
BlackBerry shares sink on bid doubts, T-Mobile stops stocking its phones
Otherwise the UX changes look quite good in general.
This topic/article should have been re-titled, "Rob Pike on Why Go continues to be incorrectly marketed to systems programmers".
Go is not a systems programming language, since it gives barely a passing nod to control. Thus, it does not fall in the same core domains of C++ or C.