drfuzzyness
It's not convenient and you need to reboot your console to go back to running commercial apps, but it is present. At least it's a one-time payment to get the developer account.
I understand that you don't want to be in the business of sharing your customer's IP, but it's hard to not see using your customer's internal diagnostic data for training as exactly that.
A universal opt-out of sharing data for training would go a long way in assuring me that I'm not about to find out that another customer is getting a snippet of quasi-private information (not sensitive to be PII, but not public enough to share). I can imagine that this'll be fine for a lot of customers but it makes me very uneasy.
Heck, you could probably incentive some users into sharing their data by gating "AI" features behind not opting-out.
A year ago, I looked into using Ultrahaptics for interactive exhibits and the yearly licensing they quoted was really high for making a single exhibit so my company ended up dropping that pitch.
I understand they want to keep their tech close to their chest, prevent competitors, and focus on large distribution deals, but it feels like they're holding it back from the people who might make the most interesting examples.
[1]: https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/30/18645604/leap-motion-vr-h...
[2]: https://www.ultraleap.com/licensing/#licensingforhaptics