News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

donaldc

Re:Google splits into GOOG and GOOGL today on Thursday April 03, 2014 @02:49AM (#7521325)
Says the study I cited, which compared historical shareholder returns for companies with stock voting arrangements like Google's to companies having one class of stock that each has one vote.
Re:Google splits into GOOG and GOOGL today on Thursday April 03, 2014 @01:15AM (#7521086)
Exactly.
Re:Google splits into GOOG and GOOGL today on Thursday April 03, 2014 @01:02AM (#7521052)
Yes, but eventually they'd have issued enough class A shares to make the class B shares less significant. Now Larry and Sergey can keep their majority votes safe forever. In the long run, to the likely detriment of Google shareholders.
Re:Google splits into GOOG and GOOGL today on Thursday April 03, 2014 @12:42AM (#7520996)
Bad news for Google shareholders in the long run. Companies with multiple share classes having different voting rights tend to underperform companies with stock that is one share, one vote.

Please note: that doesn't mean Google won't do well, but that on average it's likely to do worse for shareholders than if all stock had the same voting rights.

Since someone is sure to ask for a citation, http://irrcinstitute.org/news/multiclass-voting-companies-un... It's not the only study that has found this.

Re:Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer on Friday November 22, 2013 @08:06PM (#6784750)
Would you be willing to bet $147M that someone hadn't figured out a way around that hardware security? I wouldn't..
Re:Car Mechanic Dreams Up a Tool to Ease Births on Friday November 15, 2013 @02:12AM (#6738153)
You seem to be avoiding addressing the "prone" part of the equation.
Re:Car Mechanic Dreams Up a Tool to Ease Births on Friday November 15, 2013 @02:06AM (#6738137)
Do you think it likely that an entire field that evolved over a period of thousands of years, has thousands of people doing the job all over the world daily, and is so common and important that there is scientific research performed on it pretty much not-stop, just missed this idea?

Yes. Perhaps not all medical people personally, but as an institution, the medical field totally did.

Re:Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal on Friday August 16, 2013 @03:05PM (#6226109)
Of course between no school and school with loans the choice is clear (in an (post-)industrialized country, mind you).

Doesn't always seem clear to me. The whole point of the article was that you could be saddled with loan payments for a very, very long time with little to no improvement in job prospects.

Re:Taken on Monday August 05, 2013 @08:58PM (#6164230)
Sounds like unreasonable seizure to me. The search didn't sound all that reasonable either.
Re:Victory Lap for Ask Patents on Monday July 22, 2013 @05:07PM (#6086466)
Since the USPTO is financed by patent application fees it has a perverse incentive to continue promiscuously granting as many patents as possible.

I would hope that filers for patents that are rejected would still get charged a fee. If they aren't, they should be. After all, it still takes up a patent clerk's time.

Re:Is Sugar Really Toxic? on Wednesday July 17, 2013 @03:53AM (#6056613)
You seem to be talking about some sort of very narrow non-motion definition of thermogenesis and I am not. I guess according to you, shivering because one is cold is not thermogenesis.

If you want to know more about what I'm talking about with drastic changes in calorie expenditure, do a google search on "non-exercise activity thermogenesis".

Re:Is Sugar Really Toxic? on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @02:52AM (#6050353)
I think it could be more than that. Studies have found that some people have burned off an increase of hundreds of calories a day just through an increase in fidgeting.

And then there's this (http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=99...)

Despite the fact that all of the subjects spent the same amount of time in exactly the same confined space, the results showed large differences in the number of calories they burned. Some subjects burned as few as 1,300 calories in 24 hours, while others burned as much as 3,600 calories, a difference of 2,300 calories in one 24-hour period!

Keep in mind that most of what these subjects were doing would not be counted as "exercise".

Re:Is Sugar Really Toxic? on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @02:20AM (#6050274)
His comment says more about the content of the article than most of the other comments. An article about sugar funded by ADM is not an objective source of information, due to the very large conflict of interest.
Re:Is Sugar Really Toxic? on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @02:16AM (#6050271)
That line alone cost the article much of its credibility in my book. A scientific article should not lump all sugars together as metabolically equivalent.
Re:Is Sugar Really Toxic? on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @02:10AM (#6050266)
Not the full thirty pounds, but it could definitely be a contributing factor. And, if one's extremities get warmer while one's core temperature remains the same, the same amount of clothing is worn, and the ambient temperature remains the same, it's pretty much a certainty that more calories are being spent on heating the body.
Re:Is Sugar Really Toxic? on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @02:08AM (#6050257)
It can be even worse than that. Studies have found some HFCS to contain as much as 65% fructose.
Re:Is Sugar Really Toxic? on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @02:01AM (#6050241)
Unless you started exercising, these two statements are incompatible with one another (violates the first law of thermodynamics). What's more likely is you felt "fuller" from eating healthy foods and therefore consumed less calories.

Another possibility is that the food eaten affects the metabolic rate. I've known multiple people who stopped having cold extremities when they cut back on their sugar intake.

It's quite possible they should stop being farmers and that the nation should farm out (get it?) much of its agriculture to the developing world.

A fundamental reason countries that can afford it have agricultural subsidies is that a little overproduction ensures food security. If you outsource your food production to another country, and there's a worldwide food shortage, that country can demand almost anything from you and get it, because otherwise some of your people starve.

Re:How Google is Killing Organic Search on Monday July 01, 2013 @03:32PM (#5973027)
The organic search results are the loss-leader.
One might argue that the more technologically incompetent the censors are, the better.
One problem is that often the data is highly valued -- the team may have spent years building it.

That was clearly not the case with the flawed paper this OP is concerning itself with. So, not a valid excuse in this case.

At any rate, the team should learn to write papers as they build up the data set. That way they always have a little more data than anyone else working with it. Because without release of the data on which a given paper is based, there's no way to know if the paper is actually valid.

Re:The Terrifying Reality of Long-Term Unemployment on Monday April 15, 2013 @05:29PM (#5554525)
Women who choose to have children, and anyone, male or female, who chooses to take more than six months off for just about any reason.
Re: on Monday April 08, 2013 @03:57AM (#5510482)
It's already been tried for some foods:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_libel_laws

Re:China Mandates Fibre For All New Homes on Friday January 11, 2013 @06:28PM (#5045645)
From the article:

The standards will take effect from April 1, 2013, and will also require residences to offer equal connections to services from various telecom companies allowing customers to choose which service they want.

Amazingly, this means that China is now ahead of the U.S. regarding net neutrality.

Now, if they'd just do something about the Great Firewall..

In 2010, officials at the West Contra Costa School District, just east of San Francisco, were in a bind. The district needed $2.5 million to help secure a federally subsidized $25 million loan to build a badly needed elementary school.

Charles Ramsey, president of the school board, says he needed that $2.5 million upfront, but the district didn't have it.

If the school was really so badly needed, why didn't they raise taxes to get the $2.5 million? If they couldn't get the district to pass a tax increase in order to qualify for a subsidized loan 10 time its size, then I'm skeptical on how necessary that new school actually was.

If they couldn't afford $2.5 million up front, what made them think they'd be able to afford $34 million later?

Re:24-bit color sucks on Friday December 07, 2012 @04:35AM (#4886227)
While we're at it, let's also add 3D to displays.
Re:YC W13 Will Be Smaller on Sunday December 02, 2012 @05:23PM (#4862804)
As the batch size grew, it was hard for every partner to know exactly what each startup was doing. Especially since things often change fast at startups.

You could be running up against Dunbar's number (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbars_number) for the more social (as opposed to purely technical) aspects of what is going on at each startup. 66 startups with an average of a little more than 2 people per startup is hitting the upper limit (150) of what the human brain can handle socially. 84 startups with the same average exceeds it.

In my own experience, once a company or social grouping exceeds 50 to 150 people (the more tightly bound the social group, the lower the count), things change noticeably, so I'll be watching with interest what YC does to get around this.

Re:Why you should take your 20's seriously on Thursday November 01, 2012 @10:10PM (#4730907)
Money spent (rather than invested) in one's 20s offers greater opportunity for enjoyment than when in your 60s, when your choices are more limited

Would you care to elaborate on this? I don't (yet) have first-hand experience with being in my 60's, but I did watch my parents spend money to their great enjoyment after they retired in their 60's.

Re:Your Employee Is an Online Celebrity. Now What Do You Do? on Tuesday October 30, 2012 @03:52AM (#4716515)
You say that as if companies won't find a way to take over:

Some of them will try, from time to time, but they will largely fail. Though to be on the safe side, don't share your social networking account passwords with anyone at the company you work for..

Re:The Hardware Renaissance on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @05:05PM (#4690340)
There's a natural tendency in English to use as nouns words that were originally verbs. Examples: I'm going for a walk. I'm having a talk with someone.

Dictionary definition or not, a google search for the phrase "a schlep" returns >60,000 results.

Older »