donald123

No, firing people is more expensive than rejecting them. And a lot of bias happening in the recruiting process are unconscious. So anonymous recruiting would prevent a lot those unconscious bias in the hiring process.

And what makes it different for those people without anonymous recruiting?

Why would someone do that if they know the faked degrees or qualifications won't pass the background check eventually? Just to get an onsite interview?

there is no EB-visa, only EB green cards. But you need to get H1B first before you can jump through the EB hoops.

Here is the official eligibility. Does make sense to set the bar high initially and loose it slowly afterwards.

Eligibility

-You graduated from a US university or participated in a US acceleration/incubation program, entrepreneurial boot-camp, etc.;

-Your company is underway in terms of incorporation, financing and corporate governance;

-Your company has been accepted as a member of the VDC; and

-You possess the necessary skill, experience and talent to qualify for an H-1B visa.

According to the GEIR website, it only requires founders to spend 8 hours per week on university duties. One day a week does not sound to bad.

So Amazon HQ2A and HQ2B?

The issue here is people are forced to leave Bay Area or felt they are unable or not welcome to stay. So there is no free choice between the two.

This article just refers to some firmware vulnerabilities from Apple back in 2015, which is nothing uncommon, and Apple had taken proper measures to mitigate that. Besides it has nothing to do with China's attack.

This is bold and terrible idea. Affiliate programs encourage members to bring users, no matter through coupons or blog posts or other legit means. They have no idea if a user is coming because of a coupon or other reasons, how can they exclude this type of sites?

Besides, even if like you said a user is ready to buy something, there could be better coupons from rival retailers which bring the user to the site and look for the same product. Isn't this what a lot of retailers want? Using better coupons to bring users from competitors site?

There are many other scenarios, without considering those and just make the decision is really bad.

It's called incognito mode.

No, that's not true. A company may have been profitable for many years, but there is still risk of it becoming nonprofitable anytime in the future.

Any example of what kind of companies have absolutely no risk of "not be able to generate sufficient revenue to achieve and maintain profitability"?

Pretty common for tech companies, same like amazon IPO back in 1997, if that's what you meant "recently".

What's the point? This is a common risk for all companies.

I will definitely dispute with my credit card with the Cancellation Confirmation email. Everyone should do that, to make MP pay and die faster.

There are many factors that could affect this. There is no words of the source of the fund, although people believe he already has that secured. And all shareholders have to vote. The last and most important is when this would actually happen.

Home inspection cannot uncover everything, but without one, nothing will be uncovered before moving in. Besides, home inspection report can also be used to negotiate price, of course YMMV.

401k or IRA account.

What if the insurance company used machine learning to calculate the premium, which resulted in correlations with gender, race, etc.? Is that also considered discrimination?Whose fault is that?

That's only one side story in US, all the arguments are for political or diplomatic goal. It's like a kid lost a game would claim unfairness ignoring all the established rules, just because he's not happy.

The only risk is your blog getting blocked by the GFW, nothing else.

that's only ability in theory. Besides I don't think SEC can "get you in most places on the planet". First they are only a civil agency and it would be a civil charge. Second, they cannot easily get you in most places, and they won't spend the effort and money to do that even if it becomes criminal charge.

How about transactions made by non-residents, like people trading from outside US. They can transfer out the fund long before SEC can get to it and conclude the investigation.

OK, make sense, just found out on the SEC website. So there won't be a criminal record before DOJ or local AGs place charges.

So we'll probably manage (hide) our social networks well, and make some good offline-only friends. I do know SEC can put burden of proof to the person they suspect, but that can be prepared beforehand.

Isn't the settlement with SEC to avoid the criminal record? Besides it's supposed to be a civil charge by SEC.

Would be hard to discover if he uses his wife or relative's accounts to trade, right?