doglet
doglet on Hacker News
A possible connection between fake profile invitations from developers "from Ukraine" and Russia.
I've been getting these suspicious posts from people claiming to be from Ukraine. They always use the same template. Seems suspicious; any idea what's going on?
Extreme deception in advertising, if you ask me, from a major insurer.
Posted by
doglet on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @03:42PM
from the self-post dept.
Most likely, users were actually too efficient with the app, not being exposed to enough sponsored results. By removing this option, shoppers will be forced to wade through more sponsored results.
It was good, then got plagued by bad incentives, to sum it up
Posted by
doglet on Friday October 08, 2021 @07:55AM
from the self-post dept.
Wishing to see an article, Quora required a sign-in through 3rd party auth. Upon signing in, I unwittingly opted in to getting subscribed to regular Quora emails. This is part 1 - the unrequested subscription.Now, for part 2: upon trying to unsubscribe, I find out that my unsubscribe clicks aren't working as expected. It's because on closer inspection, the email footer link takes you to page...
Posted by
doglet on Friday September 24, 2021 @09:35AM
from the pypi.org dept.
Posted by
doglet on Saturday March 20, 2021 @11:16AM
from the show-hn dept.
An Android app that demonstrates your predictable actions, especially when trying to act quickly:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.quantifiedclick.rpsrandomnesstrainerThe premise is that you cannot both be random and fast at the same time.
As a non-expert, I need a name brand as my gold standard for comparison in normal usage scenario.
Posted by
doglet on Sunday December 13, 2020 @09:26AM
from the brianbien.com dept.
Posted by
doglet on Monday October 12, 2020 @09:35AM
from the brianbien.com dept.
> If you were to buy, say, a laptop, or a new washing machine... where would you go?
The Which magazine sounds like Consumer Reports, who purports to have no interest outside of the consumer's: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_Reports#Editorial_ind...
I wonder if the HN community has had positive / negative experiences with CR relating to this topic
I too share your logic behind placing more trust in sites that go in-depth and review across all the brands, as opposed to focusing extra attention in only one or a couple.
Regarding SEO blogs, I have seen a lot of "review rewrite" jobs posted on a freelancing site, indicating there is a market for this kind of devaluing behavior (worse than not adding value, this actually is a net-negative on society, where costs are externalized)
Posted by
doglet on Saturday May 30, 2020 @01:43PM
from the ask-hn dept.
In general, are you losing trust in online reviews because of incentives, including Amazon's affiliate program?
Posted by
doglet on Sunday April 26, 2020 @08:38AM
from the brianbien.com dept.
Posted by
doglet on Wednesday January 01, 2020 @01:56PM
from the self-post dept.
You've probably heard of "weasel words." I want to call the following a "weasel statistic" (from State Farm mailer):"[we] can help with an average of $507 in savings"(fine print: "1. Average annual per household savings based on a 2018 national survey by State Farm of new policyholders who reported savings by switching heir auto insurance to State Farm")
Posted by
doglet on Sunday October 06, 2019 @08:36AM
from the ask-hn dept.
I search a registrar today for a unique domain, but don't register it, and it becomes taken within a week. Who are the worst offenders when it comes to this kind of behavior?
Posted by
doglet on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @01:11AM
from the imgur.com dept.
I think at the root of the problem is statistical ignorance, combined with confused morale judgment, along the lines of "but if we think X is effective, it would be wrong to withhold providing X for everyone equally!"
similar to a lot of apartments incentivizing positive reviews from their tenants
In other words, repetition of the same mistakes implies higher probability of copying
Interestingly, Amazon might have a secondary payoff here: they actually get some good ground truth (honest review data) since these reviews - at least the positive ones - aren't tainted by the same incentives.
Nothing like the good old trusted hobby store. And yes, this repetition of phrase or structure should be a clear signal.
Maybe there's a market for verified customer reviews of popular items - even ones that aren't big ticket. Consumer Reports might grow to cover additional items and perhaps develop a browser extension for subscribers who gain access to trusted reviews.
We should still be able to ask them to make a reasonable effort, which keeps the fake review economy at bay
One problem is getting "ground truth." I think Amazon has a pretty good idea of a lot of near-certain true positives.
Should we conclude that Amazon does not have sufficient incentive to remove these fake reviews? Surely they could, when third-party sites easily detect them...