News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

doctorzook

Re:Stringman, an $800 open-source room scale gripper robot on Tuesday November 03, 2026 @02:19PM (#50356824)
Slow and horrible, please.
It’s a great photo, but the second-place jumping spider is my favorite: it is just so adorable.

https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/galleries/2026-photomicrogra...

Obviously, details are thin. I’m very curious how these offers are distributed by role and by seniority.
Re:One-Electron Universe on Sunday September 20, 2026 @03:03PM (#49778884)
Wouldn’t this be a CPT exchange, though?
Re:Gateway 2000's hilariously bad ads in the 90s (Part II) on Saturday August 08, 2026 @10:53AM (#49222409)
I love that these ads had (cornball) personality.
Re:Blogger defeats photographer's copyright claim on Monday June 22, 2026 @04:13PM (#48635454)
I'm okay with that. What troubles me is that there seem to be two sets of rules at play.
Re:Blogger defeats photographer's copyright claim on Monday June 22, 2026 @04:07PM (#48635383)
If a company stops publishing a book or piece of software, is it free to share because there's no longer an economic interest?
Re:Blogger defeats photographer's copyright claim on Monday June 22, 2026 @03:40PM (#48635018)
This seems... troubling to me.

Essentially, the judge found that this qualifies as fair use because (a) publishing this with commentary is "transformative" even through "Defendants used the exact, unaltered [photo] in the blog post"; (b) "the blog post is not focused on the [photo]"; and (c) "there is no indication that [the use] impacted or has potential to impact the market or value of the Photo".

As an amateur photographer, this doesn't give me warm fuzzy feelings about posting anything I shoot online. By the reasoning here, a company (as in the commercial site here) can use my photos so long as the use is incidental and doesn't earn them too much money -- or at least impact my revenue, which is currently $0.

Heaven help me, though, should I misuse a corporation's copyrighted works, even purely personally.

Re:Quirks of Human Anatomy on Sunday April 26, 2026 @09:55PM (#47916904)
I assume the intelligent designer was fired for this.
Off topic, but I’d love a good travel agent: someone who would help me cut through all the SEO and slop reviews to find the good hotels, tours, etc., and take care of booking and logistics.

We’ve used some location-specific agencies that have been really good to work with, but you first have to find them. I’d happily pay a premium to someone who would work globally. Do such things exist?

Holy crap.

I remember a sign in our dorm bathroom that read, “toilet cam is for research purposes only”. It was a joke, but always got a nice reaction from new people in the building.

But they actually sell this?! And want to charge me for it!?

Holy crap!

Re:Ask HN: I want to build my own query language on Saturday November 29, 2025 @10:31AM (#46088261)
Unless your data is really unusual, I’d generally recommend that you avoid writing your own query language and processor: it’s just damn hard to make it work well. Instead, look at how to put something like DuckDB in front of your data so people can just write SQL.
Re:Datacenters in space are a terrible, horrible, no good idea on Saturday November 29, 2025 @10:21AM (#46088196)
Why is it my job to train the machines?
> Last year, a study found that 4.5% of all bitcoin mining was taking place in Iran...

So there is that.

But the story ultimately looks entirely based on a tweet [1] from an official that Google translates as:

> This week, the first official import order registration with #currency_currency worth 10 million dollars was successfully completed. By the end of September, the use of cryptocurrencies and smart contracts will be widespread in foreign trade with target countries.

So I agree that the story is pretty thin.

[1] https://twitter.com/peymanpak_ir/status/1556927239907835904

That's just not true, though. I say that without taking a position on the merits of jury nullification.

Juries are generally charged with determining matters of fact; the judge matters of law. Even without jury nullification, a jury still determines whether the person performed a proscribed act, or did so with the requisite intent, etc.

When people talk about jury nullification, they generally mean the act of a jury actually believing that the person committed the act, but let them off because they don't think they should be punished for some other reason.

I learn everything I need from Ted talks.