dockien

"beyond the most commonly discussed applications of AI, like proposing initial designs for new molecules". at this stage it's all waffle, all marketing, all hope. i don't know why we share these posts, it's just marketing

it's low quality research. you don't need to point to perceived conflicts of interest. the drug is semaglutide, not a merck or gsk product. and semaglutide is coming of patent anyway

unless youre looking for a phd topic, a lot of this stuff is a matter of: wake me when it happens

liberal is the wrong word, clearly

they need to stop

a limited amount, eg when i walked by the news stand i could try to read the headlines on the newspapers, or read the menu at a restuarant, that was about it. some languages are very hard to hear. but it's fun to use, that's the big difference. i have used other apps and they're tedious and boring. an app doesn't work at all if you don't use it

as someone else said, these concerns have existed before and amounted to nothing, so those of us who have aged are not easily agitated. in science a deep understanding of a method is only realised if you write the code to implement it. many mediocre scientists will turn to ai tools and make many mistakes because they cannot validate