dizon
Re:Stop Whining about Rust Hype – A Pro-Rust Rant
on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @09:21PM (#29657935)
Exactly.
Re:Stop Whining about Rust Hype – A Pro-Rust Rant
on Monday December 20, 2021 @10:46PM (#29633591)
Rust could have been a great systems programming language. Unfortunately, it has been taken over by web developers. All systems programming jobs are still in C/C++.
It could have been different if Mozilla hadn't rewritten all of Firefox in Rust while complaining about C++. Firefox dropped from 10% of the web to 3% and into irrelevance during that Rust rewrite and gained nothing. Ironically, Chrome is written in C++ and ate their lunch from Firefox's plate.
Re:Stop Whining about Rust Hype – A Pro-Rust Rant
on Monday December 20, 2021 @09:15PM (#29633032)
The problem occurs when I arrive on a landing page for a project re-invented in Rust that advertises not encountering double frees as a feature of the project. I notice the project is nothing more than a build tool for web development, and I just shake my head.
Re:Speedy Web Compiler – a fast TypeScript/JavaScript compiler
on Monday December 20, 2021 @07:12PM (#29632182)
This is misleading. It claims to support TypeScript but doesn't type check.
If you're looking for fast compile times with type checking, we've been using JS++ [0], which is written in C/C++.
Re:TeaVM – Ahead-of-time transpiler of Java bytecode to JavaScript or ...
on Friday January 05, 2018 @12:02AM (#16076677)
The problem with that is you'll essentially re-download the entire JVM (and libraries) on each page load. If you don't want to use a Java applet, you would need to reimplement GC, JNI, and so on. Java didn't work on the web for a reason.
Re:TeaVM – Ahead-of-time transpiler of Java bytecode to JavaScript or ...
on Thursday January 04, 2018 @11:39PM (#16076589)
In the end, how will this differ from a Java applet?