disago
[...]
Starting with 0 paired with 1. If I think about functions or some formula that could map these values, but that might be too complicated.
Alternatively, perhaps these numbers represent something specific. For example, maybe they're representing the number of certain features in the number itself, like the number of closed loops in the digit's shape.
Let's think about that:
0 has one closed loop. 5 has no closed loops. 6 has one closed loop. 7 has no closed loops. 8 has two closed loops. 9 has one closed loop. Wait a minute, that seems to match the sequence:
0 (1 loop) - 1
5 (0 loops) - 0
6 (1 loop) - 1
7 (0 loops) - 0
8 (2 loops) - 2
So, if 9 has one closed loop, then it should be paired with 1.
But let's double-check this theory with the given pairs.
0 has one loop, paired with 1 – matches.
5 has no loops, paired with 0 – matches.
6 has one loop, paired with 1 – matches.
7 has no loops, paired with 0 – matches.
8 has two loops, paired with 2 – matches.
Yes, this seems consistent.
Therefore, 9 should have one closed loop, so it should be paired with 1.
[...]
Then it continued trying another approach related to the number of angles in the digit shape, but it discarded it. Then "Alternatively, perhaps it's related to the number of segments that are 'on' in a seven-segment display." and so on.
I shrink 10x every 21s until I'm an atom – The Micro Universe [video]
The thing is not the total size but the boundaries and the understanding of each layer and how manageable each layer is for the humans modifying and mantaining it ... which is, of course, the total cognitive complexity.
What I couldn't find is information about workshops or forums besides discord to talk and understand about its possibilities.
Specifically, I had trouble understanding how to apply it to other programming languages and their frameworks. I can see that for some of them (e.g. PHP) you have to export the project with a tool and then import it into GToolkit, but that converts such a system into just an static structure to be analyzed, but not a live system to experiment with. This would mean that live documentation would require permanently exporting and then importing the code from such system. To get a living system + its real time perspectives and embedded live documentation it seems you must program the system in Pharo.
Here you can find an independent review from a laser hobbyist perspective: https://www.laserdiscourse.org/t/inexpensive-i-phos-hd-370-9...
Inexpensive I-PhosHD Spectrometer (370-950nm)
This always allows me to recreate the TOTP entry.
NASA Studies Find Previously Unknown Loss of Antarctic Ice
The Computer Chronicles – Smart TVs (1995)
The Computer Chronicles – Gary Kildall Special (1995)
PyVISA: Control Your Instruments with Python
IBM's a Boy and His Atom: The Smallest Movie (2013)
DIY High Resolution Spectrometer (2018)
iCEBreaker FPGA Quick Look
Independent cloud provider DigitalOcean drops in Wall Street debut
Edit: spelling
Casey Muratori: I did an introduction to Git on today's handmade_hero stream
How does a whip break the sound barrier?
It promises a enhanced vision technology allowing beautiful images even inside the city and also the ability to connect to a mesh of telescopes around the globe participating in scientific research from SETI institute, allowing it to be controlled remotely by the object under investigation.
Humble Book Bundle: Functional Programming
What Is Code? (2015)
It is the most expensive service if you don't buy in bulk, but is well worth if you want to stop worrying on blacklists and other delivery problems.
[1] https://www.percona.com/blog/2015/11/12/logical-mysql-backup...
ZeroTier simple and powerful VPN, SDN, and SD-WAN with a single system
Its easy to navigate, allows good interaction with HN and is very stable.
[1] https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.github.hidr...