deadf00d

IMO the biggest issue with CLIs for agents is to know when the agent is allowed to type. When is the command fully proceed, and next tokens can now be generated.

This would work. We started prototyping this way and it worked well to an extend. The main issue you're going to have, is you need to have both chromium and the forwarder process to run at the same time. This makes it difficult to track what is running exactly.

If you're forwarder is running but the browser crashed, it will still appear as available on the Redis side. While if you're making the browser setting a key with expiration itself, if it crashes, it will stop appearing on redis side.

Those are the kind of stuff you get modifying the source, and that will be hard to do with dual process type of setup.

Thank you! I thought people might know it more as Google Chrome. Hence why I changed it on the HN title. But the original blog title specifically mention Chromium.

Tried to install it on asahi-linux fedora. Got a segfault:

```

/usr/bin/pulsar: line 151: 480856 Segmentation fault nohup "$PULSAR_PATH" --executed-from="$(pwd)" --pid=$$ "$@" --no-sandbox > "$ATOM_HOME/nohup.out" 2>&1

```

Looks like it's a fork of Atom?

An native thread management with an `async` keyword would really make it stand out from Lua for game engine uses.

Thanks ! Yeah, I really enjoyed working with the ESA. I think they mention the usage of a shield around the SEPP. But yeah, this architecture is pretty crazy for a satellite.

It's actually in production, but it's an experimental satellite, so not built to drive crazy missions for now.

"illegalities of doing something like this" -> Like what ?

Maybe you can provide sources ?

Like what ?

Thanks for your wonderful feedback.

I understood my mistake. I think the article humor has not been received as intended, that's why I added a disclaimer in the top level of the article to contextualize it a little bit more. Hope I've not done any harm to their infrastructure.

I'll definitely take care to this in my next articles.

I also trimmed a bit the long code of the w() function, making the article easier to read.

I dont say it. If people try, it's gonna lead to nothing.

But it's going to be fixed soon.

It's exacly my point in the "about phone data" section.

I don't think so. Take it as it is. A funny prétexte to speak about serious stuff.

EDIT: I'm waiting for WeWard answer. And will help them fix stuff presented in this article.

Nop, it was from the first publishing of the article.

It's a concept, what I mean is the goal is cool. Feeling like in a movie.

"for profit" that's what I say in the article.

But reality is different, I didn't earned money on this.

Before.

I'm not that crazy.

Back online ! for the last time I hope :') Also strapi take soooo much ressources...

As usual.

That's cool ! Might try to do a submission.

For which crime ?

Yeah, that's what I think too.