ddollar
ddollar on Hacker News
If you're looking for the simplicity of Heroku but want to run on raw AWS check out Convox. It's open source and free to try.
https://convox.com
Disclosure: I'm one of the cofounders
Posted by
ddollar on Friday October 21, 2016 @04:52PM
from the infoq.com dept.
We've got some changes coming along these lines. Looks like we might also be able to use CloudFront for hostname routing.
We picked Rack because we like the conceptual analogy. The naming conflict is unfortunate but there are a limited set of good words available. We hope that context will make the meaning clear.
Thank you for commenting :)
That's for the default of t2.small
ECS is incredibly powerful but definitely a lower-level primitive. We look at it sort of like a Kubernetes that we don't have to run for ourselves.
Scale has been great. We have customers running hundreds of containers on a single app without breaking a sweat.
I've noticed this as well. It seems like the docker.local hostname can sometimes take a long time to resolve. If I resolve that hostname and visit the IP directly it generally works great.
Definitely check out the beta forums as most of the issues I've found have already been reported with workarounds.
One of the founders of Convox here. Happy to answer any questions about Convox or deploying to AWS in general.
Posted by
ddollar on Monday October 19, 2015 @02:31PM
from the convox.github.io dept.
If you're using ECS to manage your clusters on AWS take a look at Convox. We're building an open source platform that makes building, versioning, and deploying code to AWS via ECS incredibly easy.
https://convox.com
Absolutely! Our plan is to release support for the container registry as soon as it's generally available.
Posted by
ddollar on Thursday October 08, 2015 @02:18PM
from the convox.com dept.
Posted by
ddollar on Friday September 18, 2015 @08:12AM
from the blog.weave.works dept.
Posted by
ddollar on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @09:13PM
from the blog.convox.com dept.
Posted by
ddollar on Wednesday August 12, 2015 @04:41PM
from the venturebeat.com dept.
It may be possible but it would take a substantial amount of work and I wouldn't recommend it. Convox achieves much of its stability and scalability from relying on hosted a AWS services.
You could definitely do this. Create one master app and then have it connect back to ECS to spawn more apps.
Absolutely! We have a few people using Convox to run and scale workers without a web app.
Yes! We have formed a business behind convox and current have a small team working on it full time. We are very confident that it will hit 1.0. Thanks for your interest :)
Woops, I ninja-edited my comment above before I saw this. Yes you can do this, see the CLI command above.
This was recently added by a contributor!
https://github.com/convox/cli/pull/48
You can update an existing cluster using something like `convox system scale --count 5 --type c4.xlarge` from the CLI. If you change the instance type your cluster will be rolled one at a time with no downtime.
We are considering other vendors but currently focused on AWS. What vendors would you like to see?
Currently we only offer Convox the open-source platform :) In the future we are considering paid support and other monetization strategies but the base platform itself will always be open-source and available for you to do with as you please.
Yes, we have people using this in production, including ourselves! Most of the scale right now is on the small-to-moderate end but once your application is up and running you're really only limited by how much AWS you want to pay for :)
Empire is awesome, we think it's a great project. We have been swapping notes with the folks working on it.
The primary difference is that Convox is backed by a company for which this is our product and has a full-time team dedicated to it.