dbnoch
We're a health-tech startup that specializes in applications for mental health clinics. Our mission is to help advance innovative mental health treatments, such as those ranging from FDA-approved psychedelics to neuromodulation. We do this through our EMR and related applications that allow us to analyze data to help doctors deliver better care.
We are looking for engineers that:
- have development experience w/ NodeJS and React
- love building products
- have experience or willingness to work for an early stage startup
Apply here https://osmind.breezy.hr/ or message me on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dannypaz/
No recruiters. Unable to support visa (might be able to transfer).
Stack: NodeJS, AWS (serverless), NoSQL, React, React Native
We're a health-tech startup that specializes in applications for mental health clinics. Our mission is to help advance innovative mental health treatments, such as those ranging from FDA-approved psychedelics to neuromodulation. We do this through our EMR and related applications that allow us to analyze data to help doctors deliver better care.
We are looking for engineers that:
- have development experience w/ NodeJS and React
- love building products
- have experience or willingness to work for an early stage startup
Apply here https://osmind.breezy.hr/ or message me on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dannypaz/
No recruiters. Unable to support visa (might be able to transfer).
It's honestly a terrible situation
The original reasons listed by Deno for removing TS had the undertones of "senior engineer who hates certain tech because they didn't use it right". Naturally, their response was to say "you probably don't understand cause you're a novice".
Why would the candidate hedge their bets on risky propositions by working part-time on TWO startups? Wouldn't it be more likely they need a side-gig (backup plan)?
What an employee does outside of work should not matter in your decision (tons of people have side gigs, for example).
What should matter is the expectations and the output of the employee. If you feel that its important to have someone working full-time, in the office 5 days a week, then I think that's perfectly OK (in the same way that its OK if an organization cannot handle remote teams). This is a decision you would be making. If you wanted 5 days a week, that would disqualify this candidate (at least for now).
IMO (and experience), the lack of commitment is the `three days a week` instead of full-time.
(Side note: this obviously wouldn't have prevented the current attack)
EDIT: Fixed spelling of replied
I can see that there may be instances where you/your company would like to have internal docs that should not be public and this utility would would work for it
My assumption is that there are a lot more people who are studying for these interviews than you think, which is why the proxy is failing (or producing homogeneous results)
The mayors opportunity to partially ignore concerns shows their incompetence towards the issue.
UPDATE I wanted to mention that I totally agree with what you had said. I do not want to blame OP for being concerned and potentially angry
This memo only helps this narrative of 'being predisposed' and that is the issue we are trying to get at.
From your last article: "Ladies, apparently, find the aggressively competitive nature of these subjects too “uninviting,” so they drop out." So many assumptions in those articles that I had to stop reading. Please look up logical fallacies.
There are more male programmers than female NOW* but that wasn't the case 50 years ago.
Systematic discrimination has been proven as fact, with palpable examples (I shouldnt have to google this for you).
The 'genetic differences' that this memo quoted have been proven wrong by science... making it psuedo-science.
There is a larger issue where the use of "junior front end engineer" means "Don't take this persons opinion seriously".
Your are 1. an engineer 2. work at Facebook. There are far better ways to say "there are other opinions at our company too"
Ajit was appointed to the chair under Trump (Republican). Ajit was a recommendation from Republican minority lead (at the time) Mcconnell. Ajit has (to my knowledge) always been a republican member of US FCC.
It is arguably also a bad business decision to shell out $$ for a language that isn't used at your company.
The example is: Your internal bias is already in effect before you even meet the people you are interviewing. You're only disgusted and aware of the explicit handicap example from your boss.
For another example: It would be the same as saying Blacks are inferior to 2. political opinions.
That is NOT OK. It is not a question of being outraged, it is a question of a hostile workplace.