davelondon
Yes, of course, because Claude Code with all these bugs could never be a successful piece of software that makes money.
23/01 -> 30/04 C$10,952.88 (C$111.76 / day)
... but pick it up a day earlier and it's C$4,000 cheaper:
22/01 -> 30/04 C$6,777.00 (C$68.45 / day)
Also:
13/01 -> 15/02 C$1,747.00 (C$52.94/day)
... but split it into two rentals and it's C$400 cheaper:
13/01 -> 01/02 C$727.00
01/02 -> 15/02 C$619.00
Total: C$1,346.00 (C$40.79/day)
Nothing makes sense.
Also, I need winter tyres. That'll be C$25/day extra... No discount for monthly rental. Doesn't make sense. I'm here with my money Hertz, but there's no way I'd deal with such a cluster-fuck.
https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/622
https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/1694
... right now your bookmarks aren't synchronised anywhere so if you lose your phone all your bookmarks are gone.
When that's working I'll change over in a second!
A non-point mass only approximates to a point mass when you're not inside it. The gravitational effect of being inside a shell is nothing... so as d tends to zero the mass that's not a shell also tends to zero, so you actually get zero force.
1) There were some cashless fast food outlets that I couldn't eat at
2) There was no way for me to book an intercity bus ticket
I eventually managed to get a bus ticket by sweet-talking someone in a shop to use their personal UPI account in exchange for cash.
I fear there's going to be more problems like this for travellers as communities go cashless around the world.
I've tested the import / export function, and it looks like we can transfer all her bookmarks over and preserve the colour information...
The only thing we're missing is an auto-backup function to store the bookmarks online. She's not a techie, so it has to be free from settings and automatically enabled.
As soon as that feature is added you'll have another user!
Actually I only get a couple of random mentions per week, no not exactly soul crushing to unsubscribe.
Reddit really needs to stop this.
https://theoutline.com/post/2205/this-38-year-old-study-is-s...
"Despite his claims of a revolutionary breakthrough, Alexander had trouble finding a journal to publish his results. Both Science and Nature rejected the study for publication, likely due to significant problems with the methodology and results. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior published the results in 1981 with little response and the funding for Rat Park was canceled shortly thereafter."
"When scientists tried to replicate the Rat Park study, they got mixed results. In 1996, a study attempted to precisely replicate the conditions in Alexander’s Rat Park, down to the breed of rat. The researchers conducted two experiments to see if they could replicate the Rat Park study’s results. In the first experiment, the happy, social rats consumed slightly more of the morphine liquid, in the second experiment, the isolated rats drank slightly more. Neither experiment reflected the Rat Park’s results, which had the isolated rats drinking up to seven times the amount of the morphine liquid as the social rats."
It generates the big readme for https://github.com/dave/jennifer (see https://github.com/dave/jennifer/blob/master/README.md.tpl).
"As you can see from the date of the refund (9th December) and the date of the court action (18th November: see attached), the refund was only given AFTER I filed the case. In fact, as my case particulars show, Etsy refused to refund me on numerous occasions, and I had already incurred significant time and expenses in documenting and filing the case.
In fact, I'm sure you will agree this refund is a clear admission of liability and wrongdoing.
As you can see from the screenshot attached, the offending trader is still today active on the platform and still flouting their responsibilities under the consumer protection laws by refusing to accept returns.
Please do not dismiss this case before I get my day in court. This kind of cynical attempt to short-cut the legal system must not be allowed to succeed. I hope you agree with me that we need to punish this kind of shady practice to the full extent of the law and send a clear message that the UK Small Claims Court legal system is fit for purpose."