dashdotme

As you get better with the pattern, you can do much more while maintaining the quality.

Are there really productive projects which rely on types as a proofing system? I've always thought it added too much complexity to the code, but I'd love to see it working well somewhere. I love the idea of correctness by design.

> Was it worth it? Yes, it is terrible, shoddy, insecure code, but he proved out a viable business with just a few hundred dollars of investment.

This feels like less of a win for the customers though. They're paying money and exposing their data insecurely, all for a product that maybe does what it's trying to do.

> Now he's hiring a developer to shore it up.

This is going to be way harder than it sounds...

I'm all for AI as a reference or productivity/learning aid, but the results without a human in the loop quickly get horrific.

Thanks for the heads up - had misremembered my own title.

Good thing to highlight. I'm not sure I'd bet on the game plan, but uv is an incredibly useful tool which I also wouldn't have bet on. Hopefully Simonw is right, and Astral can maintain as is.