News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

danhunsaker

Re:Nanobox is now free for developers on Friday December 01, 2017 @12:14PM (#15825304)
Cert was renewed, but apparently there was a bug in how the system chose which cert to use? Not certain how it had access to the old one, still, though.

Fixed, now, either way.

Re:Nanobox is now free for developers on Friday December 01, 2017 @12:12PM (#15825276)
It's more an alternative to Docker Compose, though it does sit on top of Docker itself...
Re:Nanobox is now free for developers on Friday December 01, 2017 @12:10PM (#15825261)
There's a full roadmap at https://trello.com/b/4zbckEIY/nanobox-roadmap and users' votes are the main factor for deciding what gets done in what order.
Re:Testing HTTPS Logic in Web Apps Locally with Nanobox on Wednesday July 12, 2017 @04:54PM (#14756587)
Please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any feedback on this! (Author of article; don't work for Nanobox, though.)
Re:Why I Use Nanobox on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @09:47PM (#14449938)
In this article, I try to explain why I'm such a big fan of Nanobox (https://nanobox.io) that I'd go to all the effort to not only add support for it to Mastodon (the social media platform), but to also write an article about it afterwards (https://content.nanobox.io/getting-social-with-mastodon-and-...).
Re:Ask HN: Flynn.io/Hyper.sh/Nanobox.io vs. Kubernetes on Thursday March 09, 2017 @12:55PM (#13831203)
Primarily, the orchestration tools will do a lot of the work for you, but they'll also make a lot of the decisions on how things will work. "Rolling your own" gives more control at the cost of more complexity.