damagednoob
damagednoob on Hacker News
Seems like a few old scores are being settled during this drama. It wouldn't surprise me if a lot of people on the side of RubyGems are avoiding commenting in case any legal disputes play out.
To be consistent, then the same goes for Shopify.
I think the thrust of the point is that it's not 'traditional'.
One might suggest that you may not be the only target demographic of Amazon.
When developing a small program for my Synology NAS in Go, I'm sure I had to target a specific version of glibc.
Should Automattic be compelled to subsidise their competitors?
> If nobody or barely anyone used Megaupload, he wouldn’t have been in as much trouble.
In a world where opportunity costs exist, as they do for law enforcement, this makes sense?
Did I miss the justification for the switch to Java? That decision seemed to come out of the blue.
Something I've observed as an English speaking immigrant is that in general, the US/UK is very forgiving when it comes to foreigners trying to speak English. Where certain types of phrasing and harsh words would not be tolerated with first language English speakers, the benefit of the doubt is given to 2nd/3rd language speakers because they
1. Might not have the vocabulary to express themselves correctly
2. Not understand the nuance and connotations that their word choices imply
I've seen my colleagues get frustrated in meetings while simulatenously having to assume good intent.
Choosing names like the bad actor(s) did gives them an advantage in this scenario.
I think the reason that JSON won was that at least on the client-side, it was much easier to turn the response data into a Javascript object to interact with then XML.
None of the scenarios you listed above are unit tests, which I believe is what the OP and the post was referring to.
From the blog post, it sounded like their benchmark relied heavily on a gem with a C extension (nokogiri). It's hard to imagine a performance improvement on code that YJIT has no control over.
Posted by
damagednoob on Monday November 27, 2023 @08:39AM
from the stackoverflow.com dept.
This type of problem seems to be the exact reason why Object Orientated programming was developed in the first place. Whenever I'm repetitively passing arguments from one method to another, I usually find an object hiding in plain sight.
You're effectively describing the "Parable of the broken window". Solar panels and the systems to run them now represent a significant outlay by businesses and some private individuals. Other countries don't have these expenses so the net effect is that South Africa becomes relatively less competitive and less attractive for investment.
> You have to understand that async programming is hard, and no matter how good the tooling is, it's going to make your code more difficult to manage. It has a high price.
Is it unfashionable to say that NodeJS got this right with > v7.6? It's always felt pretty straightforward to me but perhaps it just suits my mindset. It's only when I try to do this in other languages (e.g. Python or Ruby) that it starts to feel clunky.
I don't want to ban things like homeopathy and chiropractors but I have seen them attached to government hospitals in the UK. Chiropractic treatment should not be funded by the public.
Posted by
damagednoob on Thursday June 08, 2023 @05:07PM
from the github.blog dept.
> Bonus if you're in the EU/UK: in most countries in the EU this will even lead to tax breaks and higher before-tax hourly rates.
Having been a contractor in the UK for 5 years, I don't think this is true. Between VAT, Company and Dividend tax, the taxman (HMRC) always gets his share.
Absolutely and I feel exactly the same way. I have a base station for my Android phone and a KVM switch, both very cheap.
A double click of the middle mouse button and I can instantly switch between my work laptop and my phone. Interacting with my phone with a keyboard and mouse is surprisingly fast and easy.
From what I remember, PyPy has some fundamental issues with using libraries with C extensions.
Not sure what you mean? I think that was still aimed at the students who, presumably if they were to become teachers one day, would expect their own students not to cheat.