daanavitch

If you have an Android phone you can use Gadgetbridge which is an alternative app to sync your smart devices. It keeps all data on your phone. They support lots of devices, I use it with my Garmin smartwatch and I'm a happy user.

Unfortunately this website relies on Tailwind's CDN for styling, which in turn is deployed on Vercel, which in turn is mostly hosted on AWS.

The Nexstand is the most popular alternative, it's around 30 dollars.

Would it be feasible to create a videogame that uses these techniques or would it be too slow to render?

This is the one I have: https://stiebeleltron.ph/product/stiebel-eltron-glacier/ I think this particular model is only available in Asia though.

I have a multi-stage water filter setup at home that pumps the water through mineral balls as the last step to re-introduce healthy minerals that were removed during the reverse osmosis process. Because it's true, RO water is not suitable for long-term human consumption because of the absence of healthy minerals.

Chainlink Labs is also doing research in this area: https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-fair-sequencing-services-e...

'Yield farming' has been very popular the past few months. Compound Finance was the first to kick off the hype by giving away their governance tokens to people that used their platform. You can compare it to Facebook giving you some of their stock by being an active user.

The end game of those governance tokens is for them to control the whole platform, so absolutely no changes can be made to the platform without being voted in by the token holders. All of this is enforced trustlessly on the blockchain through smart contracts. As a token holder you really own part of the platform.

This is a very powerful concept, so a lot of people are interested in buying those governance tokens outright. So what you can do is put your money in one of those platforms, receive governance tokens and sell them to people that want to buy them outright. You can make quite good money doing this.

Now a lot of projects popped up that basically had nothing to offer, yet people were still buying their governance tokens, meaning you could still make money by putting your money in there and selling those tokens to those people quick before those tokens became worthless, basically an advanced game of chicken.

So what I'm saying is not all of those 'stake your money and receive tokens' are outright scams. There are some very legitimate projects being built that give away governance tokens. Uniswap comes to mind, the most popular decentralized exchange, doing over half a billion in volume yearly. There's of course a lot more nuance and not everything works as it should yet, but there's a lot of interesting stuff being built every day.

That whole website is an iframe with donation buttons and ads overlaid. The original url is https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.h...

I'm a European and I just left Korea after living there for a month. I was absolutely shocked how addicted Koreans seemed to be to their smartphones. I had so many people bump into me because they were watching videos while walking around, on public transport pretty much everyone was staring at their screen, even older people were playing those mundane mobile games. Sure, pretty everyone around the world is addicted to their smartphone nowadays, but I've never seen it as bad as in Korea.

You can even buy a "Super boost", which costs $30. It will show your profile to more people for 3 hours.

>Initially, the association (and validators) will consist of a geographically distributed and diverse set of Founding Members. These members are organizations chosen according to objective participation criteria, including that they have a stake in bootstrapping the Libra ecosystem and investing resources toward its success. Over time, membership eligibility will shift to become completely open and based only on the member’s holdings of Libra.

So it's not going to be Facebook's centralized servers, but Facebook + their friend's centralized servers. There are some vague promises, but this will start out just as centralized as Facebook Credits.

>The reserve allows users of the system to enjoy a relatively stable medium of exchange from the start. At the same time, it also represents a centralized function. For the network to be fully permissionless, the association will have to explore ways to further distribute and decentralize the reserve, including automating the verification of the assets in the basket and the process of minting and burning of coins. Increasing market competition in the custody and management of the reserve will also be explored to improve the efficiency of this service, and the costs it imposes on users and custodians over time.

So this coin will be backed by a centralized reserve, and you would have to trust Facebook that the coins you own are backed by real money, with no way of verifying this. Tether works the same way, and they are just creating money out of thin air without actual dollars backing them up. I'm curious how Facebook will decentralize this reserve, or if they will even do this in the first place.

How do potential customers find you? Do you do spend a lot on marketing?

I would love to read an article like that! I'm very curious how the architecture of the new CKEditor 5 compares to younger alternatives like ProseMirror and Draft.js.

Redux-forms has lots of performance issues, and is now considered a relic of the days when everyone was drinking the Redux kool-aid. Formik is a very popular alternative: https://github.com/jaredpalmer/formik

I have been running a Zimbra mail server for years and it's been great. Everything is included, configuration is quick and easy and there's lots of documentation online. The only negatives are that upgrading is a pain (I have to spin up a whole new server and migrate everything with Zextras Migration Suite) and the whole thing takes up quite some resources.

You can read 'High Performance Browser Networking' for free on O'Reilly's website. It has a chapter about WebSockets which talks about sending and receiving binary data: http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1230000000545/ch17.htm...

That's a coincidence, yesterday I have been trying to make an Agar.io clone in Node.js. There are some problems I've stumbled upon which aren't mentioned in this article:

- The original Agar.io server client doesn't send raw text data through the WebSocket, it sends compressed binary data. Agar.io sends packets of max 187 bytes on my computer. The Agar.io clone sends packets of a staggering 4253 bytes of raw JSON data on my computer, with only me playing! On a real-time game like this, where the user should receive immediate feedback on their actions, this is way too large. Unfortunately I wasn't able to decode the data Agar.io is sending, so I don't really know how they do it. Maybe they only send data for each player's region of interest? Or maybe they send the data for each player individually? I think that should be a decent enough solution because we can send as many small packets of data as we want over the WebSocket. We don't have to receive all player's locations at once.

I took a look at sending binary data over the WebSocket with Javascript, but it's not as easy as enabling compression, because you really have to think about the data types you're going to use, you can't just send a variable length JSON as binary data (please correct me if I'm wrong).

- The original Agar.io game processes no game logic on the client side, which makes the game freeze completely once the server lags. Most online games solve this by letting the client run game logic, but letting the server correct the client's position when he is cheating.

This method creates a whole different problem when the client receives data from the server from a position from some time ago. The client can't just correct the player's position just like that, or on slow networks the player would constantly be sent back to an earlier position. So to solve that the client needs to go back in time and replay the data received from the server. If the player is not cheating, correction should not be necessary. If the player is cheating, the client must accept the data from the server. This is a pretty rudimentary explanation, it's explained better here: http://gafferongames.com/networking-for-game-programmers/wha...

Of course implementing something like this is pretty complicated, even the original Agar.io doesn't have a system like this.