d0ne

No affiliation.

From their announcement post:

Meet Gorilla : The Language Model That Can Interact with Over 1,600 APIs and Outperforms GPT-4 for API calls

Gorilla is an open-source project, created by Shishir Patil, a PhD Student in ML systems at UC Berkeley.

It’s based on Falcon and MPT, two powerful language models that have been fine-tuned for API integration and usage.

Gorilla can parse the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) when writing code, resulting in semantically and syntactically correct API invocations. This means that it can significantly reduce hallucinations and incorrect syntax, which are common problems for other language models, such as GPT-4.

Apache 2.0 license.

Accurate. Country of Origin is basis in this case which is Greece. Adequate response would be to indefinitely bar all Belarusian originating flights from traveling through any signatory's airspace.

However, this most likely only furthers the goals of the current Belarusian administration for the population there. Enforced strictly, to include diplomatic flights, it may cause measurable change.

This precedent can not allowed to stand. It is a direct attack against free speech and international sovereignty regardless of your affiliation.

No - Running enough TOR entry and exit nodes allows one to unmask initial connections[1].

One can suspect a healthy percentage of Tor nodes are operated by Governments as TOR was developed and released by the US Navy[2].

[1] https://www.theregister.com/2015/05/30/researchers_claim_tra...

[2] https://www.torproject.org/about/history/

Why is this flagged?

11 hrs after this was submitted:

1627 points and 1263 comments yet no longer on the front page.

A moderator, please explain.

Disclosure: Founder

https://dev.ionic.com

Utilized globally by individual developers, large enterprises such as JP Morgan & Chase[1], and integrated into the KMS services such as Google Cloud[2].

1. https://venturebeat.com/2019/02/27/ionic-security-raises-40-...

2. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/clo...

Committing the initial capital to form a FEC recognized national political party The Privacy Party to begin direct opposition to this and related activities.

If you are interested in collaborating or learning more:

https://theprivacyparty.org/

Committing the initial capital to form a FEC recognized national political party "The Privacy Party" to begin direct opposition to this and related activities.

If you are interested in collaborating or learning more:

https://theprivacyparty.org/

Yes, I would be very upset.

Yes, it would be allowed in the US.

If it was removed for anything other normal violations of an Apps Stores TOS it would be violating several portions of the the First Amendment including freedom of speech, for the right to assemble, and the right to petition the government.[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights#F...

The teams at Google, Ionic Security, and many major enterprises spent a considerable amount of time enabling this scenario.

More details can be found in our blog about the launch: https://ionic.com/customer-managed-trust-in-the-cloud-made-s...

Happy to answer any questions here as well.

Wouldn’t say “Nobody”. It was obvious to enough folks in the privacy and security sectors. Facebook, along with others in that space, received view points from some of those concerned but made the decision to proceed as they did.

If a worst case to simulate on a classical computer is 2.5 days (per IBM's blog) then they should either:

1. Actually preform the experiment per their approach, compare the results, and provide tangible proof in the coming days.

or

2. Retract their claims.

In either case, exciting times ahead.

[Edit: Yes, I read their published paper[1] which only claims it is possible to achieve and does not perform the same experiment.

1. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.09534.pdf]

Canadian