cromon
So after you've pumped out 6 singles a year, spent £100 a pop promoting those said singles, £50 mastering each single.. how much do these people think 98% of artists are making these days and can be sure of what they may take home every 2 months from these singles. At least with an LP you have a fixed cost and a revenue projection that can be worked out by price per copy.
Possibly not anymore since there was an investigation into what they did years ago, but they've probably just got better and hiding it:
https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/spotify-is-creating-i...
A load of other anti-spam captchas not owned by Google...
If you find it useless then sure vilify it, but not everyone feels that the creation of an entire industry that has allowed certain people financial freedom is a drain. I feel there are much bigger fish to aim an ecological spear at.
(updated the previous comment to show production not consumption btw)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption
Bitcoin mining energy consumption: 73.12TWh
https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
Percentage: 0.0433897661%
I wish people would actually do some research before making hyperbolic statements like this.
edit (percent fix and formatting)
(0) https://www.trustforlondon.org.uk/data/londons-population-ov...
https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/cs/no-licence-needed/about.app
https://www.wealthdaily.com/articles/who-owns-worlds-gold/24...
And it's far from immune to being manipulated.
Coupled with the data from this page [1] there is no point in going too loud anyways, that's why you have gain / volume control. I'm not sure how I feel about streaming services implementing extra processing tbh. Spotify is the worst culprit adding limiting which can significantly change the sound of a recording.
I just wish other engineers would have more pragmatism in this industry, way too much overcooked and distorted music around.