coffee_bender
Re:Your Very First Microprocessor
on Saturday December 15, 2012 @10:39PM (#4927239)
Assigning the wire on the same line it is declared is supported in all major synthesis and simulation tools I have used. I'm not sure what verilog standard its from, but I would guess its part of verilog 2001.
Re:Biological computer can decrypt images stored in DNA
on Wednesday February 08, 2012 @11:05AM (#3567017)
Interesting stuff but light on details. Anyone work in this field who can provide insight as to how the data is initially encoded in the DNA?
Re:Show HN: Get a better job offer, anonymously - my weekend hack
on Monday February 06, 2012 @12:04PM (#3558128)
I primarily do FPGA design and embedded software. I agree we are definitely under represented on HN though.
Re:New Xilinx Virtex-7 2000T FPGA provides equivalent of 20 million AS...
on Thursday October 27, 2011 @10:22AM (#3163176)
I haven't tried this particular development board but it looks pretty inexpensive and would be a good starter board.
http://www.easyfpga.com/
Re:Intel Launches Atom CPU With Integrated FPGA
on Tuesday November 23, 2010 @09:33AM (#1933755)
Looking at the product brief, it seems that the Intel CPU and the FPGA are being packaged on the same module and connected over PCI-E. So the interface from the processor to the FPGA will be over this connection. I imagine the development flow will be the same as if you connected these devices externally on your PCB. The processor won't need to know its connected to an FPGA, just a PCI-E device, and the same goes for the FPGA. The standard FPGA development flow can be followed.
Re:Actel rolls mixed-signal FPGA with hard ARM core
on Tuesday March 02, 2010 @09:13AM (#1161379)
I should also note that an FPGA will not perform as well as a custom ASIC (such as a GPU) in terms of speed, power, or price (in significantly large quantities). An FPGA can be a very good options for moderate to low volume applications. You are correct with your description of a potential FPGA application. I would say it could rival or exceed the performance of the GPU solution.
Re:What I Like About vim
on Wednesday October 28, 2009 @12:37AM (#907175)
It seems like everything the author likes about vim are simply features he found more easily than he did in emacs. Duplicating a line in emacs is not difficult. emacs certainly has macros as well. A few simple google queries or looking in the emacs help system would reveal this very quickly. Not that there is anything wrong with vim, but the criticisms against emacs and other editors just seem lazy.