codepo8-hn
Creating Realistic Terrain with WebGL
ManifoldJS – Building Simple Hosted Web Apps
Why we made Vorlon.js and how to use it to debug your JavaScript remotely
Pointer Events W3C Recommendation, Interoperable Touch, No More 300ms Tap Delay
Making distributed team meetings work
Flipboard and the mobile web dream
Canvas, images and pixels – tutorial
The next UX challenge on the web: gaining offline trust
Removephotodata.com – in-browser client-side EXIF data removal tool
Re:WebIDE lands in Firefox Nightly
on Monday June 23, 2014 @12:44PM (#7932920)
App Manager. The label will be renamed in tomorrow's Nightly/
Re:WebIDE lands in Firefox Nightly
on Monday June 23, 2014 @11:46AM (#7932560)
1) The idea of the web is that the boundary between consumer and creator is very blurred. It is a world-wide, distributed environment. Making the tool you consume also the tool to create empowers a lot of people. Consider yourself a budding publisher on a very bad connection in an emerging country: you download a browser to surf the web, and that one now also enables you to create something for it. Downloading xCode or Android Studio would take ages. For developers, this is also an advantage: you use the same browser your end users have. In the past developer add-ons interfered with the rendering of the page and the performance of the browser. This gave you false results.
2) Whilst devtools make any browser bigger in initial file size (including Chrome and IE), it is not a large part of the main download (fonts are actually a huge one). The performance hit is to the overall computation (much like a standalone tool would) but isn't impeding on the browser performance itself.
Re:WebIDE lands in Firefox Nightly
on Monday June 23, 2014 @11:41AM (#7932525)
Not really comparable. Composer was a WYSIWYG editor for web pages; the WebIDE is an editor, but more importantly it manages the packaging and creation of manifest files of apps for you. I started with Composer and the output was so awful that I learned HTML instead. This doesn't hide any code from you or generates things you don't want. The templates of the apps are maintained by the community on GitHub.
WebIDE lands in Firefox Nightly
App basics for Firefox OS – video series to start your HTML5 App
App basics for Firefox OS – a screencast series to get you started
Translating marketing texts for speaking to tech audiences
Re:Web Components with Mozilla’s Brick and X-Tag
on Tuesday March 04, 2014 @11:51AM (#7341366)
Yes, very true. I was a bit fast answering this earlier. So far, there are no data-bindings in Brick.
Re:Web Components with Mozilla’s Brick and X-Tag
on Tuesday March 04, 2014 @09:38AM (#7340384)
X-Tag leverages the joint polyfill Google is the general maintainer of (Mozilla contribute code to it). It's the same one at the base of the Polymer stack.
Polymer, in comparison to Brick has a much more ambitious approach to being the framework to build apps with instead of aiding the creation of apps. Comparable with Dojo or .NET instead of jQuery.
How I save money when traveling for work
A valentine's greeting from the pNaCl to the ASM.js team – this is awesome
Facebook's Paper photo tilt feature in HTML5
Re:Why “just use Adblock” should never be a professional answer
on Sunday February 02, 2014 @06:33PM (#7168093)
Frankly, I just messed this up as my job takes 120% of my time and I hardly ever have a good connection to mess with the internals of the blog. I'd rather write :)
Re:Why “just use Adblock” should never be a professional answer
on Sunday February 02, 2014 @05:46PM (#7167937)
You are totally right, I have moved the blog from my old domain wait-till-i.com to my name about a year ago and realised in November that all my ads got killed that way (see how I game that system) :)
This was the first to come in, and I felt rather torn about it. It was needed to get one in to get the affiliate program (which changed owners in between, another thing that is kind of fishy) kickstarted again.
The good bit about these is that all they want is a link. No JS, no Flash, nothing, which is why I considered them in the first place anyway.
Utterly fair points though, so here's a fat header above them and a nofollow on the link.
Re:Why “just use Adblock” should never be a professional answer
on Sunday February 02, 2014 @05:12PM (#7167833)
This is one of the ads I have on my blog that came through an ad affiliate program. So yes, I have ads on my blog, which is my right as a content creator. You can, of course see this as a conspiracy or something evil. :)
Why “just use Adblock” should never be a professional answer
Upcoming changes to the Firefox Developer tools node picker
Re:Creating art using only circles in CSS
on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @05:10PM (#7098904)
This is pretty cool, especially as he only used the developer tools. The final product is here: http://afranoubarzadeh.se/cssart.html