News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

codenomnom

Re:How we rebuilt Next.js with AI in one week on Thursday February 26, 2026 @08:41AM (#47165966)
I partially agree with you, because Vercel put a ton of effort on this one. And the repo (and features list) is massive.

On the other hand, I do believe they drifted too much and stopped listening. As someone else said it - most of the fancy features are used by 1% of the projects, and everything else is buried in hacks and workarounds.

I also agree the tone (and especially the AI brag) is a bit too much. And at the same time it's honest - it doesn't need to be THAT hard and complex. Nor slow :)

That's why I've written an open letter to fix Next.js, to whomever wants to do it (Vercel, Cloudflare or anyone else). Because we have needs, and we cannot play this game anymore...

https://please-fix-next.com/ if you're interested

Re:How we rebuilt Next.js with AI in one week on Thursday February 26, 2026 @08:27AM (#47165769)
This is EXACTLY how I've felt. We've said it out loud multiple times but I think we never did it together.

I just wrote an open letter to fix Next.js. The goal is to compile a list of needs for whoever decides to fix those in any way possible...

https://please-fix-next.com/

Re:Show HN: Please, fix Next.js – an open letter on Thursday February 26, 2026 @08:16AM (#47165651)
I've been building on Next.js for years across multiple projects. The vinext release was the moment I realized we needed to say this out loud collectively, not just file individual issues that get buried.

The GitHub repo has discussion posts with specific pain points — not venting, actual proposals. Would love to hear what's broken for others.