My PhD research is in computational/theoretical population genetics and I have many friends on the neighboring department of neurobiology and behavior and evolution comes up relatively often in discussions about behavior. I only mention that because I have had many many discussions with people who get immediately turned off by any reference of evolution impacting human behavior, and especially so when the term "evolutionary psychology" is used. I avoid mentioning it because of how reflexive the reaction is for many people. Is there room for disagreement here? Of course. Is this "batshit crazy garbage"? I really struggle to see how.
I asked Bard to summarize the article and these are the key points:
"The article 'Happiness is a Reward from Our Ancestors' by Wood From Eden argues that happiness is a reward for those who emulate their successful ancestors. The author states that our ancestors evolved to be happy when they were doing things that were beneficial to their survival and reproduction, such as raising children, finding food, and avoiding danger. Therefore, the things that make us happy today are likely the same things that made our ancestors happy, such as spending time with loved ones, feeling a sense of accomplishment, and being in nature. The author concludes by saying that if we want to be happy, we should live our lives in a way that honors our ancestors and their legacy.
Here are some key points from the article:
* Happiness is a reward for those who emulate their successful ancestors.
* Our ancestors evolved to be happy when they were doing things that were beneficial to their survival and reproduction.
* The things that make us happy today are likely the same things that made our ancestors happy.
* If we want to be happy, we should live our lives in a way that honors our ancestors and their legacy."
In that framing I'm more inclined to agree than disagree with the author, though an obvious counter argument is the happiness of parents compared to childless adults. As far as I have read happiness for parents dips while raising the children but then is made up for in later years when the children grow up. So, if that is the case, it is still a net positive, but isnt immediately as rewarding as the author makes out.