News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

chriswilmer

You are correct! The other person is wrong. Transaction volume has almost zero relationship with mining energy usage (there are some very subtle connections, but those nuances are hardly worth getting into for this discussion).
Re:Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index on Saturday August 26, 2017 @05:26PM (#15107561)
This is a stupid comparison. The number of transactions can be increased by a factor of a 1000 easily while holding the amount of energy expended constant.
Re:Beepi Winding Down After Burning Through $150M on Friday February 17, 2017 @11:28PM (#13673612)
Oh weird, this exact comment was also posted on reddit (r/business)

What's going on?

Re:IBM says it has made working versions of 7nm chips on Thursday July 09, 2015 @03:10PM (#9860058)
I don't think the diameter of a DNA strand is 2.5nm...
Re:A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail on Wednesday November 27, 2013 @03:33PM (#6810939)
Befuddles eh?

I'll just leave this here... http://www.befuddled.org/

Re:Bitcoin for the Befuddled – Our fancy new book and website on Saturday November 16, 2013 @02:07PM (#6746018)
Co-author writing here. Although we think Bitcoin has (probably) a bright future, the book is really just about explaining how it works (the protocol and the cryptography behind it).