chacha102
Capitalism requires users to vote with their wallets. And advertising still isn't enough of a deterrent to most users to vote differently. Books and grass don't have ads.
I would rather the email honestly. IMs usually have the expectation that I'm going to respond to you "soon", which is an interruption/distraction. And they don't contain enough information so I have to start going back and forth with the other person.
At least with email, most people recognize that you will respond in your own timing in the next 24-48 hours. With IM I've found that expectation out the window.
Save the distraction. Send an email.
It's a fairly simple thought experiment to ask yourself what if there was 10x items in this array? 100x? That is essentially what the O(n) notation is trying to quantify. You just don't need to do it that formally.
Mozilla Foundation lays off third of staff
Sure, it could be helpful. But at what cost?
When I originally looked at it, I assumed that there was going to be some collaboration or other form of discussion tool to help others navigate your spec file and provide feedback. As it is, it doesn't feel like its adding the much value.
That's a pretty broad statement to make, especially with the implication that the only way you can become rich is by basically committing borderline fraud.
If you want to get rich, spend less, save and invest more. Nothing about that is fraudulent, and many would argue you'd have a more fulfilling life in the process.
I remember a study that concluded that in reality, there is a cap on how much additional money improves your day-to-day life. And if a family is already past that on one income, why do you need two?
Text that explains exactly what each color refers to would be helpful.
Can you build a successful business on advertising? Yes. But I’d argue that you don’t need to. Almost every service I pay for came to me by word of mouth. That takes time and effort to cultivate, but it isn’t affected by a software update. Or me wanting to not share my personal data.
Many homes have wall hangings with scripture that the owner has never read in the bible.
People quote literature they haven't read all over the place[1]. Implying its unique to the Bible means you probably haven't done your research either.[1]: https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/68007/50-famous-misquota...
In practice, it is far more common to see the Bible quoted as a small snippet meant to re-enforce some other point.
Any seriously complex work is very often quoted/cited as a small snippet meant to re-enforce another point. Speeches, books, statistics, other religious doctrines. In all of these cases, you can easily misinterpret the quote if you don't understand its origin.The only reason the Bible is slightly different in this context is because the reference system has been formalized as being the best selling book in history means sometimes font sizes are gonna change.
You might have well just said:
In practice, it is far more common to see [anything] quoted as a small snippet meant to re-enforce some other point.Sometimes building some simple is the best way to build something secure.
Whereas "REPEAT" might not involve the time luxury.
The word "REPEAT" should not be used in place of "SAY AGAIN",
especially in the vicinity of naval or other firing ranges,
as "REPEAT" is an artillery proword defined in ACP 125 U.S.
Supp-2(A) with the wholly different meaning of "request for the
same volume of fire to be fired again with or without corrections
or changes" (e.g., at the same coordinates as the previous round).[12]
You'd think something as destructive as artillery fire might be given a slightly longer and less common word...Distributed systems for the win!
At some point, someone is just going to hook up a decibel meter and automatically press the button when it hits a threshold. It might file a couple of bad complaints, but if the noise difference is significant, you could definitely increase your throughput.
Plus, can you imagine the compound interest? :)
That being said, I will agree with you that most remotes exist on personal computers and not server and we tend to be focused on more centralized servers. I think that is a remnant of the Subversion mentality and is slowly getting better.
But, the distributed features of git are alive and well. Maybe not as alive and well as we'd all like. But, alive and well.
Git being distributed means that you can host your project on as many different places as you want. And making the workflow to accept pull requests for Github, Gitlab, or other providers really isn't very difficult. They are all just remotes.
New Robotics Camp in San Diego
Totally get if gymanstics is taking a priority though :). Running and jumping and doing cool tricks is a ton of fun.