carlorolland56

You could use a combination of tools to make the whole process easier. I recommend tools like SciSpace and Litmaps for literature review and segregation of relevant papers. Try DAGitty online for organizing papers/studies in DAG. Here's another GPT chat-bot tailored for researchers: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-NgAcklHd8-researchgpt-official

GPT-bots are doing wonders for my research. I've been trying ResearchGPT for the past few days and it's much more efficient than I had thought. The conversations are pretty illuminating and i get redirected to the papers directly to verify the sources. Let me know if there are similar GPT bots available.

ResearcgGPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-NgAcklHd8-researchgpt-official

i don't agree. The way that most LLMs currently generate response might be through this modality. But the purpose of LLMs is to get closer to simulating how human minds and languages operate. A lot of models have been trying to overcome the problem of fabrications. GPT bots like SciSpace's ResearchGPT are trying to do precisely that.

You're right. Even if AI can get rid of some of the personal biases of people, in the medical profession, the application seems untenable. Especially because these models have no ability to intuit newly emerging threats.

Is this like ResearchGPT by SciSpace? Could you please explain what the differences are?