News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

calebclark

Re:Show HN: Counter – Simple and Free Web Analytics on Sunday March 07, 2021 @06:07PM (#26380682)
The product looks awesome!

I do have a question... If Counter is free, what is the revenue model? How will you sustain the platform? Although it's open source, it seems to be a SaaS platform that runs on your servers.

Re:“Adobe Flash is no longer supported in Safari” on Friday June 26, 2020 @11:21AM (#23652985)
It’s still around?!? I thought Steve Jobs killed Flash years ago.
This doesn’t clarify whether the article is correct or not.
Re:The Navy's Patent for a Compact Nuclear Fusion Reactor on Friday October 11, 2019 @07:50AM (#21223416)
Why is the government filing patents? The research is paid for by our tax dollars. Patenting it doesn’t seem right.
Re:Telegram quietly snuck its blockchain past regulators on Friday September 27, 2019 @11:41AM (#21093148)
What makes you think asset forfeiture in the USA is on the way out?
Re:Mozilla announces $100M grant program on Monday September 16, 2019 @04:44PM (#20988387)
Is the funding being distributed in USD or Ripple?
Re:The perfect language and why Go still isn't it on Sunday August 04, 2019 @07:23AM (#20605801)
There will never be a perfect language until there is a perfect programmer.
100% agree.
What happened to the web's early vision of an information superhighway, an open repository of data that could be linked, shared and remixed?

The efforts (and lawsuits) to lock down and control data on the public web threatens to stifle innovation. Websites are only valuable because they're connected to the internet, which for all intents and purposes, is a general utility. It was funded by the U.S. government, and is now managed by a consortium of NGOs such as ICANN, W3C, etc.

When you publish a website, you're distributing it to the world. It's similar to when you publish a book. It has always been the right of those who buy and read a book to be able to use the facts contained therein. Although readers are not allowed to steal the creative elements, they have a basic human right to use the facts however they desire. And the medium doesn't change this truth -- whether you read the book yourself, ask your friend to read it out loud, or employ a bot to read it. So it should be with websites.

Data placed on the public Web is accessible by everyone and should be usable by everyone. It shouldn't matter who parses the page's HTML, whether it's a person, a web browser, a bot or a robot.

We're starting a movement to ensure that the facts of the world are always available for innovators to build on top of:

https://dataliberationfoundation.org/

Re:Cleave.js – Format input text content when you are typing on Saturday February 23, 2019 @11:32AM (#19234019)
It's a good library -- I've used it multiple times.

However, I'm curious why its trending at the top of Hacker News. It's been around since 2016.

How about changing the name to Gooby?
Re:iMessage + Apps on Monday June 13, 2016 @05:04PM (#11897623)
It seems that there is no ability to create iMessage bots.
Re:Scout Launches New Relic Alternative on Thursday November 19, 2015 @02:55PM (#10597119)
Just Rails for now, or will Ruby in general work? We use sinatra.
Re:L.A. Dodgers Accelerator on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @08:41AM (#9725287)
This Dodgers accelerator is "Powered by TechStars". See http://rgaaccelerator.com/. The terms are exactly the same as all other TechStars programs. $20k for 6% equity + an optional $100k as a convertible note.
Re:Just how much is that 2% really worth? on Thursday July 03, 2014 @10:25AM (#7983207)
There is a bug that triggers when you add a funding round. It takes your equity percentage down to zero, regardless of the amount raised or pre-money valuation.
Re:More News Is Being Written By Robots on Friday March 28, 2014 @09:15AM (#7486976)
I was half expecting the final sentence to announce that the writer of the article itself was actually a robot named Jason Dorrier.
Re:Prison Switcharoo on Sunday February 23, 2014 @05:52PM (#7288055)
Although the supplied answer guarantees that no prisoner will die from alligators, it does not guarantee their freedom.

The answer includes a major (and I believe flawed) assumption, which is that the visits will be uniformly distributed. However, the puzzle states that "I may choose the same guy three times in a row".

The Counter could visit the switch room 44 times without flipping the switch if such visits were the first 44 chosen. After everyone visits (which would be 1,012 visits since "given enough time, everyone will eventually visit the switch room as many times as everyone else"), the Counter will be no closer to knowing the truth.

Of course, it is true that the greater the number of visits the greater the probability that the Counter's final visit will fall after everyone has visited, but there is no guarantee.

Regardless of how many visits you assume for each prisoner, there will always remain a probability that the Counter's visits will be clustered early in the visitations. In such a scenario, the Counter's role becomes useless and all prisoners will die in prison.

Re:Show HN: OAuth.io released with 70+ providers on Monday July 01, 2013 @09:55PM (#5975245)
I clicked the login button on your oauth.io site' and I was surprised to see a basic email/password form. Why not use your own product to allow login through Facebook, twitter, github, etc?