bzg
No, there is no official French announcement (yet).
Also, https://opensource.org/ai/endorsements shows code.gouv.fr in the list.
France Becomes First Government to Endorse UN Open Source Principles
OpenWebUI is not open source anymore
The Zen of Task Management with Org
He contributed to GNU Emacs Org-Mode with gnugol: https://list.orgmode.org/[email protected]/
Everything Is Spam on Facebook Unless It Is Paid Post (Or Actual Spam)
Let's Quit X
The money comes from the French government (4x10K€ for the four prizes).
We wanted to do this with NLnet to benefit from their experience and to rely on another entity to transfer the funds.
We received a lot of interesting submissions and asking public administrations who deserves the award is already a very nice exercise. We will write more about the process and the lessons learned after this first (experimental) iteration.
Emacs 29.2 Released
Mute: A scalable collaborative document editor with CRDT, P2P and E2EE
Also, self-hosting a sr.ht would make sense if we can welcome repos from any public agency, but there is no plan for such a project, partly due to the lack of resources.
Code.gouv.fr: Why Etalab's Free Software Pole Uses Sourcehut
On using to-do lists efficiently
Ten years ago, there was still heated debates about whether Nicolas Carr was right.
Now we kind of know he somehow was right, so parts of the debate are over, while others, still relevant parts, leave us speachless. Or maybe that's just me.
FYI, https://orgmode.org/list/[email protected] is about enhancing Org's syntax documentation. If you have specific needs/ideas that you'd like to share, please don't hesitate.
Emacs Survey
I don't know if the tone of conversations is different on mailing lists vs. web UIs like issues, PRs or code reviews.
As I said in another reply, I guess we can somehow reconcile both worlds by allowing PRs to be sent as patches to a mailing list - I guess https://sr.ht could support something like this (if it does not already).
The thing with the whole "entry barrier" point of people who want Org-mode development to happen on Git(Lab|Hub) is that they miss the point: I don't want more contributions, I want more engaged contributors, more committed support of any kind.
I find emails to be more engaging than emojis on a web interface - and I use both on a daily basis, so perhaps I don't deserve my #okboomer yet :)
After all, it should be possible to have PRs sent as patches over a mailing list (and we don't need manual patches to be published as PRs.)
But please clone Org's repo, make a patch - perhaps with https://magit.vc - and attach it to an email you send to [email protected]: that's all it takes.
Then we will help with polishing your contribution :)
Let me correct this one: no, you don't have to sign up to anything: (1) click on a bug entry on https://updates.orgmode.org then (2) click on "try the mailto: link" link.
This is other way around: if Org goes to GitLab, GitHub-only users will have to sign up to GitLab just to report an issue, and same for GitHub.