News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

bucaran

> The guy behind Fisherman abused DMCA to discredit OMF

I am one of the guys behind Fisherman and I didn't abuse the DMCA to discredit OMF, on the contrary, I used it to have my name properly represented in their AUTHORS file.

Now, one thing I am accountable for is, spending days and weeks nurturing and improving the project when I was involved with it. I don't know where you get your facts from, but I urge you to pay a visit to the contributor graphs in the OMF GitHub page and see who's done what and how much.

> is the preferred and popular plugin framework for Fish.

Not according to reality → http://why.fisherman.sh

Re:Fish Shell Design Principles on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @09:44PM (#11114863)
2-year old issue proof:

• https://github.com/justinmayer/tackle/issues/3

Tackle support for "modules" and "function" snippets in Fisherman proof:

• https://github.com/fisherman/fisherman/blob/master/functions...

⁣⁣

I exhort you to demonstrate my comment was false.

⁣

Bonus Points ⁣⁣

PRs are ignored for months:

• https://github.com/justinmayer/tackle/pull/16

Issues are left unanswered for months:

• https://github.com/justinmayer/tackle/issues/14

⁣

All I am saying is, if you need first-class support for your fisheries, Fisherman is the man for the job, not Tackle. But hey, Fish is great out of the box and you don't really need anything to get up and running :)

Re:Fish Shell Design Principles on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @08:13PM (#11114434)
Tackle/Tacklebox is rarely updated and still has open issues from up to 2 years ago.

Fisherman supports Tackle modules and functions, so if you are using Tackle, you can migrate to Fisherman without any hassle and still reuse and enjoy their plugins.

+ http://fisherman.sh

Re:Fish Shell Design Principles on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @07:41PM (#11114295)
Tackle/Tacklebox is rarely updated and still has open issues from up to 2 years ago.

Fisherman supports Tackle modules and functions, so if you are using Tackle, you can migrate to Fisherman without any hassle and still reuse and enjoy their plugins.

+ http://fisherman.sh

Re:Fish Shell Design Principles on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @04:53PM (#11113403)
All rubbish. 1 year late to the party and you talk like you knew what happened. By the way, are you chasing me? This is creepy.
Re:Fish Shell Design Principles on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @03:50PM (#11113030)
You are right. Fish works beautifully out of the box and you should not bother really.
Re:Fish Shell Design Principles on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @08:48AM (#11109734)
That's not true. Oh My Fish! is down because they are still using my old Wahoo code. I have since moved from that old code base in Fisherman, but they haven't. Do as you please, but learn your facts.
Re:Fish Shell Design Principles on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @04:26AM (#11108751)
Fish sensible defaults can go a long way and the scripting language is fairly easy to pick up. If you want more that what's provided out of the box, then check out Fisherman: http://fisherman.sh
I love what you are doing. I really think the way we build websites today is fucked up, so I see you are trying to move things forward, but we need something more along the lines of:

+ http://playground.webflow.com/

Thank you. All I ask is, report back any quirks or issues you encounter. Cheers captain!

Older »