bsdz

https://github.com/anthropic-experimental/sandbox-runtime

This is combined with "auto" mode.

Seems to work so far. I've manually checked various things, rw access, access to sensitive folders/files etc.

So far, I've only used it on two small projects. My major projects I've been clicking through prompts and recently switched to "auto" mode.

I'm not quite sure why anyone would trust "--dangerously-skip-permissions". I've seen these agents go off-piste far too many times, installing unnecessary packages, environments, calling sudo & creating files in all sorts of places.

There's a page on various sandboxing strategies on their site:

https://code.claude.com/docs/en/sandbox-environments

I've seen various comments in several topics with folk baking their own sandboxes. That's great. Although I'd be inclined to try Anthropic's solutions initially.

I'm not sure I trust this. A quick search finds a Psychology Today article about it along with a single reference. I lazily suspect the result is based on some type of questionnaire.

The way "chain of thought" is used in LLMs to improve reasoning demonstrates, to me at least, the value of capturing intermediate steps in some rich compressed structure. Nothing beats that than words and sentences (see them or hear them). A lot of ideas can't be captured with just photos alone imho.

Actually I found something through Gemini based on the table mod 4 idea in previous post. Thanks.

That said, thanks for sharing the emails/headers.

It's curious that Amazon hasn't flagged you for purchasing & reviewing multiple similar items in such a short span of time. I would imagine it would be quite easy to spot someone who's bought and reviewed 12 vacuum cleaners in a 2 or 3 year window.

The dependency resolution computation is an interesting problem. I think poetry at some point switched to mypyc for compilation (although I can't find conclusive evidence for it now). From my experience, mypyc doesn't really improve performance much compared to say writing a c/c++ extension. Perhaps offloading dependency resolution in poetry to a native c library is a way to match uv.

I wonder what it would take to get poetry on par with uv for those who are already switching to it? Poetry is definitely very slow downloading multiple versions of packages to determine dependencies (not sure how uv works around this?). Does uv have a better dependency checker algorithm?

Websites and applications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking. [1]

& Wikipedia:

... interactive technologies that facilitate the creation, sharing and aggregation of content (such as ideas, interests, and other forms of expression) amongst virtual communities and networks. [2]

Then, that would include HN, Discord and various online games imho. There's more about profiles / services in the Wikipedia page. That said, such definitions feel like they would also include emails / Discourse etc. Mailing lists feel like they could be considered part of "social media". Sending emails to family or close friends doesn't. So perhaps one needs to separate the platform from its various applications?

[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=social+media+definition [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media

[1] https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1350409

Apparently, vegans have lower BMI and this reduces their risk of diabetes significantly. To your point about over-indulging (tending to obesity)..

> There is good evidence that plant-based diets are associated with a reduced risk of obesity. For example, Chiu et al. (31) found that each additional year of a vegan diet lowered the risk of obesity by 7% for Taiwanese adults, and similar results have been reported for the UK (34). However, our base case analysis excludes obesity from the model because we expect obesity to be a key risk factor overlapping with other disease outcomes captured elsewhere. This is especially true for type 2 diabetes, where it is likely that we would be double-counting any benefits associated with a plant-based diet. [1]

That all said, I realize now that the sourced paper is a preprint and hasn't been peer reviewed yet. It's also funded by the Vegan Society so might be considered bias by some.

[1] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.12.26.23300536v...

Seems like an interesting data point. Original reference seems to come from:

https://www.ohe.org/insight/could-plant-based-diets-transfor...