News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

brettweaverio

Re:RVM vs Packaged Installation of Ruby in Production on Wednesday February 15, 2012 @11:10PM (#3597348)
My concern has always been, ruby (or any other complex application) is going to compile differently on like but different systems.

Over long periods of time I'd be concerned that I could never recreate the 'same' Ruby 1.9.2 installation using RVM.

How can you address the concern of small changes being introduced when compiling against slightly different versions of development and runtime libraries?

Re:Fixing holes in EC2 reliability on Saturday December 31, 2011 @01:42AM (#3410360)
Understood, however AWS manages the association to block level storage, as well as the performance tuning. You can still operate with ephemeral compute decoupled from storage.
Re:Fixing holes in EC2 reliability on Friday December 30, 2011 @02:57PM (#3408852)
EBS performance is notoriously variable by orders of magnitude. Amazon is working on this, however my personal belief is that using block storage creates an undesirable link between your storage and compute layers. Using S3, RDS or another NoSQL solution is a far more modular approach.

That being said, all apps are different and some may need block storage. I'm not saying it should not be used, however when making that decision the relation and hard dependencies created should be understood.

Ask HN: What open source monitoring tool do you use in AWS?

I'm looking to implement a monitoring solution for an AWS hosted application. I don't want to re-invent the wheel, and would like to focus my efforts on tools that are built to:* Reconfigure easily based on elastic applications* Flexible plugins and monitoring profiles which can easily be extendedAnyone have success / horror stories to share?

( Read More... | no comments | 3 points | on HN )
Re:Fixing holes in EC2 reliability on Friday December 30, 2011 @11:43AM (#3408151)
Given my experience, you are advocating way to much reliance on EBS. The nature of block storage makes it a poor choice for cloud attached storage.

Apps should be designed for redeployment quickly via configuraiton management. Persistent data should be stored to S3 or RDS, only use EBS as a last resort.

Moving from a VPS to EC2 is more than a fork lift migration, but should be viewed as an application redesign.

Re:Red Hat is the new Solaris on Thursday December 29, 2011 @05:15PM (#3405638)
True, I may not have worded it correctly. I think the best comparison is between RHEL and Amazon's Linux distribution.
Re:Ask HN: What flavor of Linux do you run in the cloud and why? on Thursday December 29, 2011 @11:17AM (#3404064)
Agreed, however I've been feeling for a while that Red Hat is becoming the new Solaris. Everything takes twice as long and is a couple revs out of date when compared to other distros.

I've been struggling to find the value in their services to justify this trade off.

Re:Ask HN: Best book you read in 2011 on Tuesday December 27, 2011 @10:06AM (#3395962)
Big +1 for Daemon, one of the best modern science fiction novels I've read.
Re:Ask HN: Best book you read in 2011 on Tuesday December 27, 2011 @09:51AM (#3395890)
Atlas Shrugged - Ayn Rand

The Lean Startup - Eric Reis

Rework - 37signals

Re:Goodbye GoDaddy on Sunday December 25, 2011 @05:34PM (#3391742)
They also offer $20/Year SSL certs.
Re:Goodbye GoDaddy on Sunday December 25, 2011 @04:52PM (#3391662)
There is a benefit to splitting concerns. Though I never plan it, over the years I make changes to both DNS and registration for my domains. It always goes smoother when you can update them independently.

Older ยป