News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

bmvakili

Try wayback machine instead of google webcache as latter isn't showing the original.

Here's the vulnerability note stating to replace hardware on 01/04/2018 at about 1800 GMT: https://web.archive.org/web/20180104032628/https://www.kb.ce...

Then here is the same page with the replace verbiage removed on 01/04/2018 at about 1900 GMT: https://web.archive.org/web/20180104180023/https://www.kb.ce...

Re:Building a Game with 133 Characters of HTML, JavaScript on Tuesday June 30, 2015 @01:17PM (#9806859)
It doesn't work; I tried jsfiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/hpxua8jb/
Re:Why nobody pays for Sublime? on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @09:15AM (#9771301)
Because it's free and not that different? To clarify, I use and I don't pay; but am seriously considering; probably will pay once beta's over (I'm using the beta for version 3); definitely appreciate the tool; I really enjoying using Sublime tool.
Seems ridiculous; my analogy: organization of volume of books; or classification of library; I can use any classification. I can go to Library of Congress; copy they way they organize their books; and implement same in my library. Why can't you do that with Open Source code?
Definitely thinking about it now.
Am I reading this wrong or what's missing? "Because we conclude that the declaring code and the structure, sequence, and organization of the API packages are entitled to copyright protection, we reverse the district court’s copyrightability determination with instructions to reinstate the jury’s infringement finding as to the 37 Java packages. Because the jury deadlocked on fair use, we remand for further consideration of Google’s fair use defense in light of this decision. With respect to Google’s cross-appeal, we affirm the district court’s decisions: (1) granting Oracle’s motion for JMOL as to the eight decompiled Java files that Google copied into Android; and (2) denying Google’s motion for JMOL with respect to the rangeCheck function. Accordingly, we affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part, and remand for further proceedings."
But deadlocked on Google's fair use.
Re:WikiSort – Fast, stable, O(1) space merge sort algorithm on Saturday March 15, 2014 @10:16AM (#7404684)
I got widely different results there: C - 105.868545% C++ - 80.0518% Java - 61.664313124608775% Probably the optimizations there; can't easily be done in Java one; interesting nonetheless, thanks for post.