bluu00

wtf? that's not the kind of picture i wish to imagine while talking of SF

I wish that's a joke lmao

what about a _telegram_ message?

where?

> They just don't like the amount of freedom tesla's system gives the driver while supercruise forces the driver to stare straight ahead the entire time.

That's L2 sir. L2.

look at this,

  :root {
      ...
      cursor: none !important
    }

  html {
      ...
      cursor: none !important
    }

  * {
      cursor: url(cursor.19bbb4e3.png), none !important [0]
  }


  #cursor {
      background: rgba(200, 200, 255, .2);
      transition-property: width, height, border-radius, transform;
      transition-timing-function: ease-out;
      transition-duration: .1s;
      pointer-events: none;
      transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
      border-radius: 100%;
      position: absolute;
      left: -1000px;
      z-index: 99999;
      width: 36px;
      height: 36px
    }

He kinda messed up, mayb?

> Quibi also faces a patent infringement lawsuit filed by interactive video company Eko, which alleges that Quibi stole its technology allowing viewers to watch episodes either horizontally or vertically on phones from Eko.

technology allowing viewers to watch episodes either horizontally or vertically

What da fak!

> In the case of Nano Defender, users were not notified before control of the extension was transferred to a third-party. That's not the right way to handle this.

The whole browser extension ecosystem seems to be purposefully bloated with such loopholes allowing such backdoors. I remember seeing a clg presentation, "a browser is a literal nuke you carry on yourself, whatever be the ... or claims as of sandboxing, you're already dead" - loosely quoted.

link wasn't working for me, so.

Two different things. PG has inspired many. So, I don't think there he needs a "sensitivity reader" for a blog post.

- https://www.gatewayhouse.in/telegram-protests/

Interesting. (ﾟヮﾟ) You seem to know well that search is beyond ranking and retrieval. [1]

> I’d start off with not doing state of the art because it’s overkill for an “MVP”.

Can a search engine "MVP" sustain without using sota methods/practices?

What should be the initial scale for a search MVP for which it just works? In the modern realm.

[1] : https://medium.com/startup-grind/what-every-software-enginee...

just a note (you can ignore) : I am actually a believer of iterations in development and incremental optimisations. But even a minimum viable product should be able to work.

EDIT #1: you're cool. but i really dont know what elastisearch is. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ And a google "search" hurts at the moment.

EDIT #2 :

> multiple people respond and say that Lucene basically does the same thing Google does and that Lucene is poised to surpass Google's capabilities in the next few years. It's been long enough since then that we can look back and say that Lucene hasn't improved so much that Google is in danger from a startup that puts together a Lucene cluster. [1]

[1] : https://danluu.com/sounds-easy/