News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

bluedel

Re:Mathematics has changed. Let's act like it on Monday November 02, 2026 @11:24AM (#50339196)
I really can't get behind this. The idea that our jobs being interesting and fulfilling was just a happy little accident, a weird artifact of capitalism, and that if that goes away, oh well, too bad. Back to the thankless back-breaking grind. It's just the way of the world.

That's just so defeatist and pessimistic.

Re:Sharing AI progress in mathematics on Thursday October 08, 2026 @05:47AM (#50003793)
What higher wealth?
Re:Sharing AI progress in mathematics on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @05:24AM (#49990277)
I think the crosswords framing is a little silly, but I have to wonder what comes when we use our technology to optimize the fun and interesting parts out of every job. There's only so many years of my life I can dedicate to back-and-forths with a chatbot. What if we advance our glorious civilization but our jobs just get more and more thoughtless and miserable?
Re:CSS-Tricks in Limbo on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @09:40AM (#49726907)
Imagine you're making a pizza, but you're out of pepperoni. Your mother-in-law is allergic to bacon. Now imagine I'm leaving your house and riding my bike into the sunset.
Re:Blizzard Workers Win Historic Union Contract on Friday September 11, 2026 @04:29AM (#49655200)
There's a (in my opinion) very weird tendency to think that workers are a hindrance to the product, that anything that gets made is made in spite of the people making it, rather than thanks to them. I think it's very destructive.
Re:HTML Can Do That on Friday August 21, 2026 @08:15AM (#49386948)
That's weird, it works on my phone. Are you sure you didn't refresh the page with the anchor tag still in your URL parameters?
Re:OpenClaw isn't fooling me. I remember MS-DOS on Monday April 20, 2026 @05:23AM (#47831966)
Am I right to be a little concerned by the phrase "it'll go straight to the pirate bay"?

Not to be a narc or anything, but is OpenClaw liable to just perform illegal acts on your behalf just because it seemed like that's what you meant for it to do?

Re:EFF is leaving X on Friday April 10, 2026 @03:26AM (#47714754)
If an organisation had any serious chance of moving the needle by staying on X, musk would simply find a reason to ban them. X leadership isn't interested in fair and balanced discussion.
It's not a command line argument, it's part of the title of a hackernews post.
I think the point they're making is that the failure mode of a waymo and automated air traffic control could look the same from an angle, but would have very different consequences.
>I want my comments judged by the contributions they make and do not make to the discussion

There used to be a sort of gentleman's agreement that I could spare the time to read and judge your comment because you went through the effort of writing it.

I feel like that would only change your opinion of the quote if you originally equated it to "Government bad!", which is a thoughtless thought.
Re:We mourn our craft on Monday February 09, 2026 @03:49AM (#46943114)
I refuse to believe you sincerely think this is a salient point. Determinism was one of the fundamental axioms of software engineering.
Re:Ian's Shoelace Site on Monday February 02, 2026 @10:36AM (#46857167)
I've made a couple with the Kumihimo technique, using cheap embroidery thread. The texture is similar to paracord, but you get your own pick of colors and patterns. I'm surprised at how durable they are.
Hopefully not. I'm impressed with the engineering, it is a technological achievement, but my only hope right now is that this tech plateaus pretty much immediately. I can't think of a single use-case that wouldn't be at best value-neutral, and at worst extremely harmful to the people interacting with it.
Re:Clawdbot Renames to Moltbot on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @03:13AM (#46792447)
I don't think it's obnoxious to protect your trademark against a literal homophone operating in the same space as you. I'm confident a lot of people heard about "clawdbot" and assumed it was an anthropic product.
Re:A letter to those who fired tech writers because of AI on Friday January 16, 2026 @04:10AM (#46644568)
Newspapers and professional journalism are indeed doing well right now, nothing to worry about.
Re:I'm Just Having Fun on Monday December 22, 2025 @04:55AM (#46352732)
you're right, blog articles should be entirely devoid of stylistic choices and signifiers.
Re:I'm Just Having Fun on Monday December 22, 2025 @04:38AM (#46352609)
the lack of capitalization (and occasional omission of punctuation) was already a big thing on tumblr / twitter 10 years ago, especially in some anime and LGBT-adjacent spaces. I don't think jyn got it from Sam Altman, and I don't think he had that big a role in popularizing it.
Re:Is it a bubble? on Thursday December 11, 2025 @05:23AM (#46229665)
It's a fairly common descriptor
Re:It’s been a very hard year on Tuesday December 02, 2025 @05:48AM (#46119872)
Everything that we know and love is reducible to a basic CRUD web app
Re:Don't push AI down our throats on Monday December 01, 2025 @08:17AM (#46107042)
I think there's quite a jump from "ChatGPT has a high user retention rate" to "AI is useful to people". That's like saying funko pops were useful to nerds just because they kept buying them.
For some definitions of "you" and "die".
Re:Yes, I will judge you for using AI on Friday June 27, 2025 @11:14AM (#44397430)
At least if the car doesn't start, you can immediately tell.
Re:Twitter's pivot to x.com is a gift to phishers on Wednesday April 10, 2024 @11:12AM (#39991609)
No, you got that right. Only the displayed text is affected.