News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

bhiller

That it is, it just excludes the comment at the header. It has actually changed a bit since then, but that is still pretty much it.
It looks like Facebook didn't strip out the copyright since it says "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer."

It is also clearly a file that is supposed to be used outside of Oracle, the following comment states (at http://www.java.com/js/deployJava.txt): "You are encouraged to link directly to the live copies."

The real question is why it appears twice after being packaged.

Re:Being Eric Schmidt (On Facebook) on Monday October 11, 2010 @11:18AM (#1779957)
You can create an account, add all of your emails, but then limit their visibility to 'Only Me'. That way people can't impersonate you, and you don't need to reveal all of your emails to everyone.
Re:New Facebook TOS change allows app producers to sell your data on Wednesday October 06, 2010 @02:22AM (#1762956)
Direct quote: "You will not sell user data."... Not sure how that is equivalent to selling your data, unless there is something else I am missing.
Re:Tell HN: Every photo in Facebook is somewhat publicly accessible on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @11:10AM (#1739668)
I have found another security hole: When viewing a photo, you can take a screenshot of it and upload it to anywhere else on the internet, where any arbitrary person can see it.

This violates all of my expectations of privacy.