benjamcal
Re:Many See I.R.S. Penalties as More Affordable Than Health Insurance
on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @05:56PM (#10854559)
What you said doesn't contradict the 60%. 60% is the normal federal share. I had a job that specifically involved forecasting state budgets (which obviously involved looking at historical trends) and forecasting the ACA's impact.
To clarify, these variations have historically averaged around 60%, and likely will continue to (sans ACA expansion): http://kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/federalstate-share-o...
Re:Many See I.R.S. Penalties as More Affordable Than Health Insurance
on Monday January 04, 2016 @11:23PM (#10841182)
To clarify, yes. After 2020, the federal government continues to cover 90% of the cost (compared with 60% normally) of the expansion indefinitely. So, for a state government, it is likely the cheapest way to ensure a large number of low income people are insured.