becomevocal
Wanted to add, in terms of extensibility, we've really tried to make the key parts of the UX hookable. Most of what you see on this page like tool / reasoning calls, voice, loaders, approvals, etc are completely replaceable in a few lines of plain JS: https://www.persona-chat.dev/advanced.html
It means you can do interesting things like go straight to OpenAI or Elevenlabs voice for read-aloud while streaming the main chat from your framework.
I'd like to improve the shareability of what's created in the ecosystem, but we're not quite there yet.
If you have ideas for more hooks or extensions you'd like to see, we're very much in listening mode.
We'd like to experiment more with this but haven't got their yet. Just some internal prototyping
My gut says you'll need want to hook into custom render functions and theme config to map to your game styles, since it's going to look very different than the standard OOTB options.
The best file to use as a starting reference is here: https://github.com/runtypelabs/persona/blob/main/packages/wi...
If you run into anything, GH issues are welcome!
For everyone passing by, Alex created https://docs.mcp-b.ai/ and we use two of his libraries to enable WebMCP more cleanly. We found MCP-B after we built our own
It's interesting how experimental web tech vs. frameworks are. Kind of flipped once React and Next.js took off. Now we get to see what the browser can do again. Find the balance that works for each case
Note we actually use React / Vite and Next with Persona across a few of our products. It's nice in our case because the agent specific state (including event debug stream if you turn that on) doesn't need to interact with the main app at all. Keeps updates to agent UX from blowing up other parts of the app
Show HN: Persona.js – a vanilla-JS agent UI library with native WebMCP (MIT)
Hey everyone. My cofounder and I are formally open sourcing (MIT) persona.js. It's a VanillaJS library that helps anyone build agentic experiences on the web, without a framework dependency, and full WebMCP supportSo, why'd we do this?1) We're super fans of the web and the browser can do a ton today2) We've seen AI builds be way overly complex because the FE requires a large project within an...
Agents help a ton with the discovery, but the act of building a product needs a deeper level of thought and validation to make it actually better than what came before. So IMO what you see is people still learning what needs to be understood and crafted first hand to make a product better (including economics)
We’ll get there if more of us try
Personally I find being able lean on our heavily documented standards in /review gives me back time to dive into what I want to craft next.
Same with scheduling repetitive tasks an agent can do for me well once instructed well. I am freed up to do something else I want to focus actively on because I like it and want it to be great.
Now stress about OKRs and OKRS in general… that’s a different issue
I always hope for the best when someone has a new list because of this. I want a de facto source!
Also I think I need to build a chicken selfie system now...
Source: myself through wife which is maxed on chickens and has her own site with no ads
We need both! Hurrah
For complex features and architecture shifts I like to send proposals back between agents to see if their research and opinion shifts anything.
Claude has a better realtime feel when I am in implementation mode and Codex is where I send long running research tasks or feature updates I want to review when I get up in the morning.
I'd like to test out the git worktrees method but will probably pick something outside of core product to test it (like building a set of examples)
Back in 2008-ish the site could generate ambigrams for you too. It was powered by an algo that pieced together a large set of hand drawn glyphs. PHP at it's best :D
https://web.archive.org/web/20080730222127/http://www.wowtat...
and
> So make your stuff stand out. It doesn't have to be "better." It just has to be different.
equals... craft?
Isn't that what has always mattered a great deal
The core agent files links out to architectural and product decisions as well (i have a /docs folder for them)
This works better for me and I can get a good result when asking to make sure docs are updated whenever changes are made
Going to try to build a sizable feature while doing chores to fully test it. So, thank you so much?
I remember the first time my wife saw your coop, she said “that is what I wanted to build”, so you probably have some product market fit going on. We had already built our run at that time, however now she thinks a good supplemental product idea is a feeder with a camera. Like Petcube combined with the Grandpa’s Feeders product. She would definitely be up to chat about her chicken keeping needs and all the ideas that come with it. Her details are on her blog: tropicalchicki.com
Note for other HN peeps: If you really like cats and nature you probably will like chicken keeping! They have lots of personality and communicate in more ways than we are typically taught.
On the article, I wonder if people commonly see their first chickens in trees on islands. It’s a common thing in PR, which also has a lot of wild chickens roaming. Vieques, the smaller sister island off the east coast of PR, kind of celebrates this. Lots of chicken murals, themed gifts, names of beaches, etc
In the Waiting Line - Zero 7: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq336zk2cZk
Are you adding printers as you find them? Are open source projects OK, as long as they can be bought already assembled?
I ask because I know a team here in Austin / Houston that seems like the should be on the list: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/re3d/open-gigabot-an-op...
Mixpanel is one of the few pieces of software I've been excited to pay for. Hate to see them get a bad rap.
It seems like there may be certain start-ups being targeted that aren't a perfect fit for the pricing structure. If you are B2B SaaS the price is well worth it.