News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

barneyrubble

Re:Cycles X on Saturday April 24, 2021 @04:11AM (#26923210)
Brecht’s videos show off improved rendering. I think the person you’re replying to is instead referring to viewport performance in general: scene complexity and size, undo performance, framerate, responsiveness, that sort of thing.
Re:Cronk: Long-lost beverage resurrected after 120 years on Saturday July 04, 2020 @06:11AM (#23731331)
(obligatory) It's your birthday?!
Re:Why does writing matter in remote work? on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @06:45AM (#23078557)
Did anyone else have to read that headline multiple times in order for their brain to parse it?
Re:The Far Side: Uncommon, unreal, and (soon-to-be) unfrozen on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @03:21PM (#20999070)
Totally missed that, facepalm
Re:The Far Side: Uncommon, unreal, and (soon-to-be) unfrozen on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @05:38AM (#20993268)
1999 seems pretty late into the evolution of the web for a creator to be so concerned with scattered instances of their work being shared online. 1995-96 I'd believe--the web was mostly still new, norms hadn't adjusted to its presence. But by 1999, the web was well underway, and it would've been weird for random scans of comic strips not to be found freely in all corners of the internet. Did he really email hundreds of site owners?

(Unless the places he was sending his form letter to were hosting most of his back catalog, which would amount to full-scale piracy.)

(me googling it) man, you're not kidding, there are memes upon memes of this. How did I miss it?
This is legit one of the funniest comments I've ever seen on here.
Blender. C'mon now.
What the. I thought I recognized that book instantly upon seeing that preview of it and skimming the article, but the fact that it had been released only a few years ago made no sense to me--I was sure I'd seen previews of it something like 15 years ago, and then I suddenly remembered, vividly, how eerie it had seemed at the time, and I remembered being in this same house I'm in right now, looking at it online and feeling weirded out. But just now, after more reading, I found out the book is based on some earlier and similar black and white pages he'd drawn back in 1989 for Raw magazine, which must've been what I saw online 15 years ago.

So basically the last 10 minutes of my life have been super weird and totally appropriate in the context of that dude's work. Gaaah. Thanks for the link, and the bizarre meta experience I just had.

Re:Stephen King: Can a Novelist Be Too Productive? (2015) on Thursday June 14, 2018 @12:36AM (#17309313)
Links to some rants please?

My Google fu is weak today.