bank-error

The real answer is that as our ability to test our current model or knowledge, so does the model evolve. Saying a bunch of stupid science words is just how idiots online attempt to generate consensus to their line of argumentation because they struggle deeply with ontology.

Think about our knowledge of the Earth rotating around the sun vs. the sun rotating around the Earth, or flat Earth vs a spheroid Earth, our models increase in accuracy as their testability increases in tandem.

We don’t know. That’s the hypothesis aspect of Scientia.

Our current working hypothesis(es) and theories have not been invalidated so far and thus, they depict the most accurate model we have.

But it’s just a model: data that we get artists to turn into pretty “space” pictures.

If the public had a real understanding of astronomy and space exploration it would neither be seen as interesting or worth funding.

Yeah and none of that will be workable if we find out there’s some sort of occluding mechanism or distortion surrounding the solar system. Like saying you will find water because you took a picture of a mirage.

None of these banks will accept a risky startup placing assets. Why? It’s a bad risk, similar to how bad risk was adopted in the 2008 financial crisis.

Looks like Silicon Valley just disrupted their pants on the global stage.

Edit: Business accounts differ from personal accounts my galaxy-brained friend.

There definitely is someone who doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Do you know who I mean? Just wanted to say that I really appreciate reading another comment on this site made to present the user as intelligent while having no substance beyond “hurrr a bank would totally take your money no questions dude” ;)

We will see who is liquid after Monday and then Wednesday of next week.