News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

b59831

What is the alternative?

Or are you just for creating classes of people that just can't be critiqued in any circumstance?

This kind of sounds like, 'Wont anyone think of the grifters?!'

This is a stretch.

Someone makes an uneducated point but it must be defended because Musk bad...

Do you think you're making a good point here?

Re:Grok3 Launch on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @03:57PM (#43095015)
First two points are pretty much the same and ignore all nuance.

Third point is opinion, at best.

Forth point; couldn't this be said about any politician?

Fifth point; So you're saying that no outside group is capable of auditing.

I'll stop there. You've drank the koolaid.

Re:Mozilla is eliminating its advocacy division on Tuesday November 05, 2024 @07:01PM (#42056317)
Hopefully they'll replace them with people who'll make firefox better.
This is a sexist statement
This isn't an answer to the question.

Smug responses like this just means you don't actually have a point.

Why is your hate boner relevant here? It's fine if you want to be irrational but why shout it out?
Europe does something but America is to blame.

:eyeroll:

What about flight distance? Cargo capacity? Navigation ability?...
Veering off topic to culture war nonsense. Nice!

The important thing is you feel smug.

This is based on nothing but 'america bad'.

Do you think this makes you look smart?

> pickup trucks are always brought up as the problem

Don't you know the outgroup is bad and the cause of our problems? /s

And they wonder why people in flyover states dislike them.

This is pseudoscience but it's antiwest, so I guess it gets a pass.

:shrug:

Look at the comments on this site whenever speech is brought up.

"I'm all for free speech BUT that person said lets go brandon, that's hate spreech... "

Privacy is given away for political flag waving.

Re:Medicine is plagued by untrustworthy clinical trials on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @10:45AM (#36773238)
Vox is an awful source.
Re:Show HN: RDrama Featureset on Friday July 07, 2023 @11:29PM (#36641112)
:marseylove:
It depends on who you hire...

Most jobs take bids and so many people hire the lowest bidder. Because of this, a lot of contractors price their bids as a best case scenario... Or they bid an exactly what was asked and nickel and dime for everything extra.

Wow, some people just can't get over their musk hate.
Same?

So ICE will arrest you for a VPN?

ICE runs concentration camps?

This comparison is silly.

Re:Culture eats policyiculty of gov software procurement on Saturday June 24, 2023 @05:07PM (#36462663)
Worked great for USSR, Venezuela, Cuba, ...

FDR also had to deal with things like state's rights... But why worry about nuance?

The important part is you feel superior.
Can you a communist example where someone like Snowden was treated better?
Re:Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018) on Tuesday June 06, 2023 @03:47PM (#36218172)
> As someone who used to mod ...

I'm pretty sure you were the problem

Rdrama has already done it... did it better too
> Third world country of America

This is silly. You expect anyone to take you seriously?

Have you used Wikipedia?

It was one of the first culture war battlegrounds... And it's been owned for a while now.

Looking at these gross payments (and executive migration to think tanks), are you really pretending things aren't political?

Re:'Algebra for none' fails in San Francisco on Sunday April 16, 2023 @10:11PM (#35596142)
And the kids who's families can't afford to move/go to private school pay for the rich family's idealism.
Re:Why flying insects gather at artificial light on Sunday April 16, 2023 @10:07PM (#35596114)
And where will these zones be? Why do I get the feeling your great idea will be entirely someone else's problem.
Re:GPT-4 gets a B on my quantum computing final exam on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @04:13PM (#35530865)
I guess it doesn't have to make much sense, as long as you can blame America...
I'll quote another comment: > Javice interfered in due diligence in a very sophisticated way. JPMC tried to verify user data but Javice claimed they couldn't provide user personal information "due to privacy concerns". In the end Javice was able to convince due diligence team by engaging in multiple layers of fraud. Sure due diligence team could've done a better job, but Javice was a sophisticated adversary. It's not like due diligence team didn't have any concerns. But they wanted to balance their concerns against possibility of passing a good deal due to formality.

Older »